Intel Officially Announces Arc A-series Graphics

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Intel Officially Announces Arc A-series Graphics on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
The control interface looks really good. Also love it does not require a login. hardly anyone is excited by laptop GPU's including myself but I do like what I am seeing software side. Decoupling the game optimizations from the core drives is really nice.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260048.jpg
Finally, we have a new Major player in the GPU market. This is exciting for the whole industry and most importantly - the consumer.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/263/263507.jpg
cryohellinc:

Finally, we have a new Major player in the GPU market. This is exciting for the whole industry and most importantly - the consumer.
Yes it's exciting. I just hope they don't release proprietary technologies that then are injected into some games to promote them, and is then considered as a "major/must have" thing. So we don't end up spending more time talking about that extra feature only Intel would have, instead of "the basics".
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
But thats a jun-july for a mobile when will desktop parts come out and will it be too late when competition is ready to release already a next gen. I like that market is heating up we will all benefit from that. End of the year could be great after all this madness last year and half.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
The gains look pretty good for the lowest tier already, compared to Intel's previous generation, assuming those Intel slides are trustworthy. The better tiers ought to be quite decent. But of course I don't really care about laptop GPUs. You can draw some predictions from this, though, I believe. It's much too early to try to claim anything for sure, but Intel could be offering something worthwhile once the real graphics cards hit the store shelves. Let's hope it's store shelves and not miner (rack) shelves.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
thesebastian:

Yes it's exciting. I just hope they don't release proprietary technologies that then are injected into some games to promote them, and is then considered as a "major/must have" thing. So we don't end up spending more time talking about that extra feature only Intel would have, instead of "the basics".
They wont. The developers would flip out. In fact the development community likely will start putting pressure they all follow standards. It will cost too much to develop and optimize for three different GPU makers. That's the beauty of three players.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248291.jpg
Shame that XeSS won't support other GPU manufacturers at launch. But what matters is that we'll have more competition and this is likely to increase performance or lower prices.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/189/189980.jpg
So, new Intel GPU on the annual GURU3D contest? Hope that does not disqualify me from it.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
anticupidon:

So, new Intel GPU on the annual GURU3D contest? Hope that does not disqualify me from it.
I wonder when will@Hilbert Hagedoorn will add Intel gpu/driver section on the forum?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180081.jpg
Undying:

I wonder when will@Hilbert Hagedoorn will add Intel gpu/driver section on the forum?
When they make them easy to download? :P
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
cryohellinc:

Finally, we have a new Major player in the GPU market. This is exciting for the whole industry and most importantly - the consumer.
So true! We really need more competition on the hardware side.
data/avatar/default/avatar20.webp
With so few players and intel manufacturing nvidia chips, I can only see gentlemen's agreements and price manipulations of some kind. Don't hold your breath.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248291.jpg
AMD published benchmarks claiming that the 6500M beats the Arc A370, while using less transistors.
AMD.jpg
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Horus-Anhur:

AMD published benchmarks claiming that the 6500M beats the Arc A370, while using less transistors.
AMD.jpg
No wonder intel didnt show any benchmarks vs competitors. 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
Horus-Anhur:

AMD published benchmarks claiming that the 6500M beats the Arc A370, while using less transistors.
AMD.jpg
amd showed 6700xt beating 3070
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

amd showed 6700xt beating 3070
It didnt. 6700xt was competitve not faster.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248291.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

amd showed 6700xt beating 3070
Not really. In their slides they showed the 6700XT wining some, losing others and a tie in others.
AMD-Radeon-RX-6700-XT_15_575px.jpg
Nothing like the beat down, they show the 6500M doing to the A370M. It's probably real. Intel loves to compare their hardware to the competition. The fact that they only compared to their own Iris gpus is probably an indication of not being competitive with current offerings from AMD and nVidia.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
cucaulay malkin:

amd showed 6700xt beating 3070
For the most part, AMD showed the 6700xt right where it is, a card that beats, such as in assassins creed valhala, and loses, to the 3070. While there were outliers like hitman 3 that amd showed they beat the 3070 that i didnt see reviews confirming, it wasnt by a large margin and maybe the day they tested it, it did. But realistically, AMD showed the 6700xt right where it was in its announcement slides.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
I bet drivers have a big role in this.