Somewhat off-topic, but why is Intel sticking with the Lakes after all these years? It made sense going from Skylake to Rocket Lake, since there wasn't a whole lot of change between those, with AVX512 being the real big difference. But with 10nm, Xe graphics, P and E cores, DDR5, vulnerability patches, and a MCM design, these are some of the most architecturally different products we've seen from Intel in a while. And yet, we're still getting Lakes? Even as an enthusiast, it's getting rather hard to remember which one came when. I don't think Intel is doing themselves any favors by continuing the Lake codenames, as it can imply just an incremental upgrade.

schmidtbag:

Somewhat off-topic, but why is Intel sticking with the Lakes after all these years?...

Makes me feel special.

This is some extensive use of glue right there 😛

Venix:

This is some extensive use of glue right there 😛

is it really "glue" though? 🙄 i see alot connecting chips there though

tsunami231:

is it really "glue" though? 🙄 i see alot connecting chips there though

I am sure they do not call their glue infinity fabric but they sure called this practice glueing 😛 .So yes there is a lot of glue 😛