All is well, but - what is the point in dual-port when the interface is still single, as I understand "dualism" is achieved only virtually... No? So there's no benefit of any redundancy... If anyone can shed more light on this, please do.

Probably like in a SAN where you can have 2 controllers and either 2 severs or a sever with 2 host controllers accessing it so that if either or the Servers (for example fail-over cluster) or if 1 host controller in a server with 2 host controllers goes down. Of course this is only what springs to mind because I set up things like Hyper-V Fail-over clusters for clients with SAN's etc, maybe there is another intention I have not thought of :P

Probably like in a SAN where you can have 2 controllers and either 2 severs or a sever with 2 host controllers accessing it so that if either or the Servers (for example fail-over cluster) or if 1 host controller in a server with 2 host controllers goes down.

Ahh, that does make sense. Thank you.

Hi all! The upcoming 6920k, 30 and X line will be the same actual socket v3? Thanks

Hi all! The upcoming 6920k, 30 and X line will be the same actual socket v3? Thanks

Yes 🙂

Yes 🙂

COOL! This new 14nm will be very nice to make some over... Thanks!