Intel Core i9-13900K could get extreme performance mode at 350 Watt TDP

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Intel Core i9-13900K could get extreme performance mode at 350 Watt TDP on our message forum
#6043308
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
That is certainly extreme.
#6043317
data/avatar/default/avatar05.webp
This isn't even extreme 🙂 My old 3900x could draw 350w easy when overclocked on water. 5900x and 5950x too. My 6 years old 7980xe was drawing 700w+ on cold water 😀 (still going strong) I'm ready whatever the powerdraw is 😎
#6043329
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Horus-Anhur:

Good thing energy prices are going down. Oh wait. It's the exact opposite.
People who are buying computer parts like 13900K and RTX4090 don't care about power usage and can afford it.
#6043330
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
who cares about that abomination.
#6043336
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/173/173869.jpg
Seems of topic but is 13gen fully support avx512 or this one also missed edit: yep
#6043343
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/278/278016.jpg
nizzen:

This isn't even extreme 🙂 My old 3900x could draw 350w easy when overclocked on water. 5900x and 5950x too. My 6 years old 7980xe was drawing 700w+ on cold water 😀 (still going strong) I'm ready whatever the powerdraw is 😎
There is no comparison, the processors you mentioned have 12 cores and more, I can't imagine how much current a 13900k would draw if it had 12 "big" and more cores.
#6043352
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
nizzen:

This isn't even extreme 🙂 My old 3900x could draw 350w easy when overclocked on water. 5900x and 5950x too. My 6 years old 7980xe was drawing 700w+ on cold water 😀 (still going strong) I'm ready whatever the powerdraw is 😎
The 3900X 350W is for the WHOLE SYSTEM, not just the CPU. Even manually OC 5900X doesn't get over 236W at multicore test, with default not going over 186W. 13900K goes 350W on its own.
#6043368
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
kanenas:

There is no comparison, the processors you mentioned have 12 cores and more, I can't imagine how much current a 13900k would draw if it had 12 "big" and more cores.
Well, the 13900K supposedly has 24 cores, though only 8 are P-cores. So, those E-cores sure must be working hard too because I don't get how else the power draw could be that high.
Fediuld:

The 3900X 350W is for the WHOLE SYSTEM, not just the CPU. Even manually OC 5900X doesn't get over 236W at multicore test, with default not going over 186W. 13900K goes 350W on its own.
Let's not forget the 13900K's TDP is stock. It's to be expected to get very high power draw from a manually OC'd chip, because you're pushing it to its limits and you have to give yourself some voltage headroom to retain stability. In some cases, people might be doing an all-core OC, which will also draw more power. So, it is actually a bit extreme for a desktop chip to consume that much power from the factory when it most likely doesn't boost all cores at max speed, let alone for much longer than a minute.
#6043372
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/34/34585.jpg
nizzen:

This isn't even extreme 🙂 My old 3900x could draw 350w easy when overclocked on water. 5900x and 5950x too. My 6 years old 7980xe was drawing 700w+ on cold water 😀 (still going strong) I'm ready whatever the powerdraw is 😎
You do realize that's impossible even with 1.4v and all core overclock of 4.9Ghz you are looking at about 270w so where's the other 70w gone to? Even Buildzoid when he talks about the power phases of the X570 gets to the 300w power delivery no Ryzen even a 59050X can ever pull that much power even on LN2. So 350w on water is mythical at best.
#6043375
data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp
Fediuld:

The 3900X 350W is for the WHOLE SYSTEM, not just the CPU. Even manually OC 5900X doesn't get over 236W at multicore test, with default not going over 186W. 13900K goes 350W on its own.
Have you tested yourself? Try harder 😉
#6043396
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
nizzen:

Have you tested yourself? Try harder 😉
I am stuck at max 140W on a 5800x because higher simply does not make sense because the performance is not there unless doing allcore workload. The performance/voltage scales like crap above those speeds. Doubling 8 cores at 140W is 16 cores at 280W, so I am also missing 70W, just like Dazz notes. Skatterbencher gets around 270W Buildzoid gets 270W Gamers nexus stops at 253W Hardware unboxed says it used 140W more then stock when overclocked so around 260-300W (370W system power measured). Der8auer stops at below 270W too Should they all try harder?
#6043401
data/avatar/default/avatar09.webp
TLD LARS:

I am stuck at max 140W on a 5800x because higher simply does not make sense because the performance is not there unless doing allcore workload. The performance/voltage scales like crap above those speeds. Doubling 8 cores at 140W is 16 cores at 280W, so I am also missing 70W, just like Dazz notes. Skatterbencher gets around 270W Buildzoid gets 270W Gamers nexus stops at 253W Hardware unboxed says it used 140W more then stock when overclocked so around 260-300W (370W system power measured). Der8auer stops at below 270W too Should they all try harder?
Yes, they didn't go all in, but they didn't go in for it either 😉
#6043429
data/avatar/default/avatar06.webp
Overclockers understand that the clock manipulation techniques employed by Intel for the past several generations are overclocking: Our overclocks have employed power limits far beyond 350W for as long as this type of power management has existed. Given that Z690 voltage regulators support loads in the thousands of watts, the leak that “only Z790 will support the new power mode” appears designed to prepare critics to think uncritically when they see a Z790 motherboard working an upcoming 13th-gen Intel Core CPUs harder than when that same processor is mounted to the Z690. Critical thinkers must remember to hold manufacturers of Z690 motherboards responsible for any performance shortcomings, rather than credit Intel for magically “enabling” a feature on Z790 that Z690 already had the hardware to support. https://www.pcinq.com/tech-press-falls-prey-to-raptor-lake-350w-scam/?fbclid=IwAR3yo7yH7uAk7khwFzqd1Djmj8EafrsWz6FZ2QLsFhQIB2sZiEmA8r1Gb34
#6043431
data/avatar/default/avatar10.webp
tty8k:

How many FPS in AIDA64 ? Cause in games it's more like this for those with such budget:
upload_2022-8-19_0-36-15.png
:p Nizzen
I use 3440x1440 165hz and 1080p 360hz and 4k 120hz. It depends on the game 😉
#6043437
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/266/266726.jpg
schmidtbag:

Well, the 13900K supposedly has 24 cores, though only 8 are P-cores. So, those E-cores sure must be working hard too because I don't get how else the power draw could be that high.
That's quite easy to explain actually, the big 8 cores are probably going to be running in excess of 5.2ghz all core, This isn't on a die shrink so more speed = exponentially more power, reminder that this is still 10nm +++++(+?) , despite what intel's marketing department would have you believe. alderlake at >5.2ghz all pcore is uncoolable essentially , even though there are chips that theoretically can do it, so I wonder what kind of tricks they have up their sleeves. [SPOILER]https://overclock3d.net/gfx/articles/2022/04/12124056211l.jpg [/SPOILER] the 12900ks has an all pcore clock of 5.2ghz and the system draw exceeds 425w , so 350w tdp is believable especially since it might have more cores, I should mention that the 12900ks is almost uncoolable, the guys at OC3D used a 360 rad with 3000 rpm noctua fans at 100%, and the temps still hit 100c! https://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/cpu_mainboard/intel_core_i9-12900ks_review/16
#6043456
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
user1:

That's quite easy to explain actually, the big 8 cores are probably going to be running in excess of 5.2ghz all core, This isn't on a die shrink so more speed = exponentially more power, reminder that this is still 10nm +++++(+?) , despite what intel's marketing department would have you believe. alderlake at >5.2ghz all pcore is uncoolable essentially , even though there are chips that theoretically can do it, so I wonder what kind of tricks they have up their sleeves. [SPOILER]https://overclock3d.net/gfx/articles/2022/04/12124056211l.jpg [/SPOILER] the 12900ks has an all pcore clock of 5.2ghz and the system draw exceeds 425w , so 350w tdp is believable especially since it might have more cores, I should mention that the 12900ks is almost uncoolable, the guys at OC3D used a 360 rad with 3000 rpm noctua fans at 100%, and the temps still hit 100c! https://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/cpu_mainboard/intel_core_i9-12900ks_review/16
Question is: who is playing cinebench on a overclocked 12900k 24/7 😛 I'm playing games on 12900k @ 5.4ghz all core, an it hits 63c on the hottest core. Not delidded
#6043457
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282473.jpg
tty8k:

How many FPS in AIDA64 ? Cause in games it's more like this for those with such budget:
upload_2022-8-19_0-36-15.png
:p Nizzen
what scene is being tested here ?

Next Page