Fixed it for you boss 😀

If it has only 1 big core and 4 small, why single core performance is 50 points and dual core performance is 100. And 8 core(basics all 5 core) has 4x50 (single core) score

vbetts:

Fixed it for you boss

What did I do now?

Hilbert Hagedoorn:

What did I do now?

Link wasn't included lol

D1stRU3T0R:

If it has only 1 big core and 4 small, why single core performance is 50 points and dual core performance is 100. And 8 core(basics all 5 core) has 4x50 (single core) score

You are right. On 1st glimpse it may remind anyone of Bulldozer which had 8 Cores, but 2 cores shared so much, that it ended up being similar to 4 Core under certain conditions. But here it may be due improper clock management, IMC limitation or other thing. Anyway, intel's small cores (Atom) had like 1/2 of IPC from big ones and were not worth anything under 3GHz. Sadly, having Big Core ticking at 1,75GHz does not make it much better. But as long as it really is make of multi-layered-chiplet design, I could excuse any deficiency as it would be 1st of its kind in consumer market. And area saving this will bring will persuade entire market that mobile devices can, and should go this way. (At least I hope they will use saved up space for larger battery or more performance in smaller notebook/tablet.)