Intel Comet Lake-S (up-to Core i5-10600 ) series pricing listed at etailer
Click here to post a comment for Intel Comet Lake-S (up-to Core i5-10600 ) series pricing listed at etailer on our message forum
Undying
Being 80$ more expensive than r5 3600 is not that atractive.
BReal85
So while Zen 2 had 2 models priced the same as their Zen+ counterpart (2600-3600 and 2700X-3700X), it seems that every Intel model is getting more expensive.... LOL
steffi
"have been listed at Chech and Slovakian stores to a certain extent."
- its Czech and Slovak stores ...
TheOne79
well, that's srange prices, for example here 9600kf is around 200eur....
shamus21
Do not forget you have to buy a new motherboard also 😱 😱 😱 no really. AMD all the way now.:)
Undying
To think 3700x cost only 20$ more than this. What ware they thinking.
Silva
Mundosold
And I thought they were going to have a price war with AMD, guess that Intel Inside sticker is still worth a lot to people.
H83
Maintaining or increasing the prices of the new CPUs seems to be a suicidal strategy from Intel... Maybe they don´t want to sell desktop chips...
shalafi
Loophole35
Intel is AMD's best marketing campaign thus-far.
kings
asturur
I think you are too negative here.
I would buy an AMD 3700x too compared with the 10600 non K.
But the 10600 is still a 4.8 turbo and a 4.4 all core on a 6/12 cpu.
If you have to buy a new system from scratch and so you need a new motherboard anyway, if you are a gamer it makes sense. Is still going to offer more fps in some games, without costing more than a 3700x
When we see the i7 prices we can compare with the 3700x price.
Being 80$ more expensive then a 3600 is not a deal breaker if you have preferences.
I bet the 10600 will probably win over the 3600 in terms of benchmarks
Also to answer the guy about central europe ripping off people, there are high taxes and vat for shops. Shipping costs for etailers. I mean, street price is different from msrp.
Saabjock
When Intel can give me this level of performance for $200...then and only then, will we talk.
For the record: This is my very own R5-3600x and a GTX1080Ti.
[youtube=8etMrHWdMyQ]
Borys
Intel is completely CRAZY! At this point of the market they put all this cpus more expensive than AMD?!?!?!
Mega LOL!
gx-x
why would they want to be cheaper than AMD? It's not them who are fighting to gain desktop market share. They did drop prices somewhat, and they did release better CPUs then they probably intended to.
I am just being realistic here, not defending or attacking anyone.
Andrew LB
80% of the market share according to steam hardware survey as well as highly respected Mercury Research. All that fake news proclaiming AMD having 40%+ was nothing but lies based on a few select retailers who mostly sell AMD. Gone are the days where writing an article that deceptive would be an express ticket to the unemployment line. Too many so called journalists do nothing but push an agenda these days.
The vast majority of people buying a new CPU regardless of it being AMD or Intel, also buy a new motherboard. So your point is fairly pointless. But i guess that is to be expected. Reminds me of how when AMD chips were behind in pretty much every way, you'd still get people claiming they're better because of price/performance. Which later became performance/watt. All of which was meaningless, just like when Intel would use the 'higher mhz' argument when they released the Pentium 4 even though AMD was wiping the floor with them in performance.
Intel can't make chips fast enough to supply the demand. Why on earth would they lower prices? They also have over TLD LARS
NCC1701D
Tiny_Clanger