Intel Comet Lake 10 Core Procs in 2020 - Socket 1200?
Click here to post a comment for Intel Comet Lake 10 Core Procs in 2020 - Socket 1200? on our message forum
DmitryKo
I'll sure buy one more iteration of Skylake with 10 (20) cores but not until it matches or exceeds Socket AM4+ pin count, with 1350 pins minimum and 40 PCIe lanes direct from the CPU... oh wait, that's LGA2066 and Core i9-9900X. OK then, so probably never.
Ricardo
10 cores would be under the 12 that AMD already offers at very respectable single-core performance. Not to mention that 2020 is supposed to be the year when zen 3 launches, so there's even the possibility that these 10 cores will be put against faster 16 core processors.
Considering the fact that Comet Lake is 14+++nm, I think this will be DOA, unless there's some very deep price cuts and they can somehow squeeze even more performance from their 14nm process. I mean, they've been doing it for what, 5 years now? How much more refined can it get?
Loophole35
Oh how little I care at this point. Until they get 10nm to work or scrap in favor of 7nm I donโt care to see another product from Intel.
JonasBeckman
Isn't Intel's process more refined though the 10nm process seems to have been incredibly troubled and I don't know how Intel anticipated AMD's Zen, Zen+ and current Zen2 architecture and how it would stack up.
Then again the nm stuff is mostly marketing anyway from what I recall and for users it's more about features and performance, pricing too of course and then things like sockets and getting a fan or water kit mount and of course motherboards and all that stuff.
Guessing Intel will also start doing something about the various exploits and potential performance issues from workarounds and fixes here but no idea if that's 2020 or later and who knows what sort of hardware changes will be needed.
EDIT:
"Isn't Intel's process more refined...they've sure had a lot of issues with it though."
*Thumbsup*
Yeah..about that.
schmidtbag
Kaarme
Is it so that Intel won't switch to a new architecture (would be about the time) before they can make the CPUs using the smaller process technology? So, if they can't get it up, they will just keep refining the old Core arch, and increase the core count by two, the MHz by 200, or something.
asturur
NCC1701D
How does the clock speed a proc can hit work in relation to fab size in nm? Are they not directly related? Always wondered how Intel can reach such high clock speeds when there are smaller nm dies that can't push past a certain point.
schmidtbag
Denial
DmitryKo
super I/O' (for COM LPT PS/2 8254 FDD PATA PCI etc. based on LPC bus) will soon be gone. Yes, say goodbye to booting your 1987 DOS 3.3 USB-floppy images.
Honestly we don't even need a chipset anymore - all we need is PCIe to connect our peripheral devices directly to the processor. 16x videocard, x8 expansion slot, 4 x1 expansion cards, x1 2.5G Ethernet port, 3 x4 M.2 /SATA RAID, 8x USB4/Thunderbolt and USB3/USB2 ports... here go your 40 PCIe lanes offered by mainstream AMD X570 chipset (itself a scaled-down version of EPYC 'Matisse' I/O die).
I was basically saying that even though Intel obviously planned their response for Zen2 announcement well in advance, yet they probably underestimated the impact and underdelivered on the Comet Lake specs. So it would probably take them another iteration in the form of Tiger Lake silicon (Willow Cove architecture) to get closer to AMD SocketAM4+ which I suppose comes with Zen3/Zen4 and introduces DDR5 memory - and match AMD's 1350+ pin count too ๐
As for PCIe lanes, everything is PCIe these days - SSDs, video cards, chipset links, even flash memory cards (QXD/CFexpress and SD Express), as well as USB4/Thunderbolt and DisplayPort 2.0. The old days when chipset was handling DRAM, expansion cards and all kinds of legacy BIOS 'schmidtbag
DmitryKo
schmidtbag
DmitryKo
tsunami231
i must be reading this wrong, but wtf does Wi-Fi 802.11ax have to do with cpu? do they plan to add that stuff into the cpu? or is going into the chipset? which last i check wifi/ethernet were never part of chipset but extras on the motherboard
D3M1G0D
DmitryKo
Intel Wireless AC M.2 cards (in particular 9560, 9461, 9462) only contain analog signal processing and RF curcuits, while the actual Wi-Fi controller was moved to the CPU/chipset. These cards use Intel's proptietary CNVio interface and will only work with recent Intel desktop chipsets and mobile CPUs.
Full-featured Wi-Fi/Bluetooth controllers come as standard M.2 2230/2242 E-key card, using PCIe lanes for WiFi and USB2 for BlueTooth. They fit in the M.2 E-key slot positioned next to the rear I/O panel.
These expansion cards are commonplace as they replaced mini-PCIe Wi-Fi cards for notebook computers. They come bundled with a few desktop motherboards which include antenna connectors bracket on the rear I/O panel; you can also buy them separately and mount the antenna bracket on the free PCIe expansion card slot.
However some