Intel announces 58GB and 118GB Optane 800P SSD
Click here to post a comment for Intel announces 58GB and 118GB Optane 800P SSD on our message forum
nosirrahx
I wonder if they will announce that the 900P is already Optane compatible. As of now they still have not updated their list of supported drives:
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/27401/Intel-Optane-Memory-User-Interface-and-Driver-for-System-Acceleration?product=99745
https://i.imgur.com/qcQLEIG.jpg
eddieobscurant
Useless product with such low capacities and absurd pricing
Warrax
No offence to Intel but...no ones cares unless price is right which is not.
Agonist
0blivious
Diminishing returns is all that comes to mind.
nosirrahx
A big blunder by Intel was not doing anything at all to explain why 4KQ1T1 speed matters so much. Mixed reads and writes with high queue and thread count and sequential reads matter very little in a desktop environment.
Disk bench software lists super impressive numbers for certain drives indicating that they are fantastic at multiple user database workloads and moving very large files from point A to point B over a fast connection, both of which you don't do on a desktop PC.
The other blunder was releasing Optane years after it mattered. If you have a motherboard that supports Optane then you did not install windows on a HDD. Conversely if you have a HDD that would be perfect for Optane you likely do not have support for it.
On top of all that the only enthusiast case where Optane makes sense is hidden as an undocumented feature. I used a 280GB 900P as Optane cache for a 4TB SATA SSD and the performance is staggering, far better than any of these M.2 cache drives.
According to Intel this configuration does not even work even though it is the only current way to get 4TB of storage combined with top of the line 4KQ1T1 performance.
jortego128
MegaFalloutFan
These are VERY fast, faster then any NVMe drives and are big enough to install Windows 10, the 4K speed is tad faster then 900p based on this review
Check out this 4K performance, 960 pro 1tb does maximum 50-60mb/s
https://imagescdn.tweaktown.com/content/8/5/8545_26_intel-optane-ssd-800p-58gb-118gb-2-nvme-pcie-review.png
nosirrahx
MegaFalloutFan
https://cdn.pbrd.co/images/HbkwsRh.jpg
Like this? 🙂
Agonist
Speeds dont matter with crappy sizes and crappy prices.
And no ryzen support, intel can swallow a massive F*** You.
MegaFalloutFan
nosirrahx
nosirrahx
MegaFalloutFan
nosirrahx
MegaFalloutFan
nosirrahx
https://i.imgur.com/hstUl6T.jpg
The last system I built uses a UPS and we have a backup generator that kicks on in 3 seconds so I was not afraid of setting up Primo that way, also went with 32 GB of RAM specifically to experiment with RAM cache.
Currently I have the RAM cache set 12 GB on top of the 280 GB Optane 900P as Optane cache on top of a 4 TB SATA SSD. Even when cache misses it falls back to the 900P which is of course also insanely fast.
Obviously the issue with all of this is the price. Between the price of 32 GB of RAM, the 900P and the Primo key this is hardly cost effective. Its too bad because this system is crazy fast.
It kind of feels like Samsung moved a lot faster than Intel expected and forced the Optane drives into the market before they were ready to be competitive solutions.
On the topic of RAID 0 and the 900P, check this out. Its a bench from the bootable RAID 0 a guy made from 4 900P drives attached to a Asus Hyper 16X:
Agonist
RavenMaster
Those capacities are way too small for this day and age.