GeForce RTX 2060 review (founder)

Graphics cards 1049 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for GeForce RTX 2060 review (founder) on our message forum
#5624297
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
I was correct since day 1. Equal to 1070ti and faster than Vega 56. Thanks for the great review boss. Nice and quick work as always. 😀
#5624306
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance. BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
#5624307
data/avatar/default/avatar28.webp
Undying:

Nice review. Overall card it does offers a 1070ti performance. BF5 ray tracing performance was abysmal. I can imagine Metro will probably run even worse.
It was Ultra setting. Without RT it was only 5fps behind 2070 in 1080p. If RT was low/medium perhaps it could achieve much more than 60fps. So it is a great card for the money.
#5624312
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
warlord:

It was Ultra setting. Without RT it was only 5fps behind 2070 in 1080p. If RT was low/medium perhaps it could achieve much more than 60fps. So it is a great card for the money.
48fps at ultra so low setting will probably run at 60fps but dont forget thats a 1080p. Maybe HH will include lower RT settings in next benchmarks.
#5624313
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
Well, As expected from parameters. Little OC to match 2070 in power consumption and it is almost same performer. Almost $500 performance for $350.
#5624322
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248994.jpg
The performance was where it at least should be, so no surprises there. Only time will tell if the RTX will be worth paying for in this card. Btw, the "Star Wars Battlefront II Ultra HD" chart has accidentally the Vega 56 bar highlighted, not the RTX 2060 bar.
#5624328
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Kaarme:

"Star Wars Battlefront II Ultra HD" chart has accidentally the Vega 56 bar highlighted, not the RTX 2060 bar.
Checking, thanks.
#5624336
data/avatar/default/avatar18.webp
I can buy a 1070ti card for the price they are selling 2060 for in my country. So..why would I need this 6GB card if I can get a 1070ti with 8Gb ram that has better performance? For crappy Huang rays? 😉
warlord:

faster than Vega 56.
Now undervolt (and OC) this vega 56. Most if not all reviewers have no idea how to run Vega cards. + I bet they compared a crappy reference vega 56 that can't hold it's core clock high enough to a dual fan 2060 FE.
#5624337
data/avatar/default/avatar08.webp
Sleeves up for the next great review, let the disappointment, from NVIDIA of course, continue!
#5624340
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
350$ isn't mid range at all.
#5624343
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
Alright, this actually seems good, however we were told that $349 is the price for the highest version, the 6gb GDDR6, if that is so, doesn't this mean that the other options will be cheaper? Seems a bit strange to be honest, NVIDIA would have announced the lowest price, for the lowest model first, instead of the highest price. Something seems a bit off.
#5624344
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
FrostNixon:

Alright, this actually seems good, however we were told that $349 is the price for the highest version, the 6gb GDDR6, if that is so, doesn't this mean that the other options will be cheaper? Seems a bit strange to be honest, NVIDIA would have announced the lowest price, for the lowest model first, instead of the highest price. Something seems a bit off.
This is the highest model. There will be 2060 6gb with gddr5, also 3/4GB variants with gddr5/6 that will be cheaper.
#5624351
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Undying:

This is the highest model. There will be 2060 6gb with gddr5, also 3/4GB variants with gddr5/6 that will be cheaper.
Exactly, this doesn't seem like NVIDIA, they usually announce the lowest price, not the highest.
#5624355
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/105/105985.jpg
I thought this thing would be closer to the 1070 but not bad performance for the price
#5624363
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
If the best AiB rtx 2060s are close to vega 64/gtx1080 and the normal versions are faster than 1070/1070ti/vega56. The lower spec'ed 2060s will dominate under 299$. No one will buy ever again rx 570/580/590. AMD is in a bad situation if they do not push navi fast. I swear I didn't see that coming. Everyone was crying about expensive cards, but Nvidia, is getting even more money.
#5624377
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
warlord:

If the best AiB rtx 2060s are close to vega 64/gtx1080 and the normal versions are faster than 1070/1070ti/vega56. The lower spec'ed 2060s will dominate under 299$. No one will buy ever again rx 570/580/590. AMD is in a bad situation if they do not push navi fast. I swear I didn't see that coming. Everyone was crying about expensive cards, but Nvidia, is getting even more money.
What are you talking about? RX-580 has some 25~35% lower performance than this top RTX 2060. And costs $175~225. Those lower 2060 cards with 4/3GB of VRAM will not even hold psychological advantage over 4GB RX-580. And as they will be weaker than this 2060, their performance advantage over RX-580 will be pretty low.
#5624382
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
Fox2232:

What are you talking about? RX-580 has some 25~35% lower performance than this top RTX 2060. And costs $175~225. Those lower 2060 cards with 4/3GB of VRAM will not even hold psychological advantage over 4GB RX-580. And as they will be weaker than this 2060, their performance advantage over RX-580 will be pretty low.
Do your math better. Rx 580 is ~65% slower and rx590 is ~45% slower than 1070ti which is equal or slower than rtx2060. There is no comparison at all here.
#5624393
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
warlord:

Do your math better. Rx 580 is ~65% slower and rx590 is ~45% slower than 1070ti which is equal or slower than rtx2060. There is no comparison at all here.
Hilbert's numbers: Battlefield 5: RX-580 is 29% slower than RTX 2060 SotTR: RX-580 is 31% slower than RTX 2060 Deus Ex (MD): RX-580 is 26% slower than RTX 2060 SW BF2: RX-580 is 28% slower than RTX 2060 Strange Brigade: RX-580 is 23% slower than RTX 2060 Far Cry 5: RX-580 is 27% slower than RTX 2060 Formula 1: RX-580 is 38% slower than RTX 2060 Destiny 2: RX-580 is 40% slower than RTX 2060 Witcher 3: RX-580 is 41% slower than RTX 2060 Kingdom Come: RX-580 is 33% slower than RTX 2060 GTA 5: RX-580 is 28% slower than RTX 2060 SoW: RX-580 is 34% slower than RTX 2060 If you want to thank me, go and revisit 3rd grade of elementary school.
#5624405
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/199/199386.jpg
Anyone else think that GPU cards should be released in a cheap=>expensive manner? This should have been released first, with the 2080 about "now". I don't understand why they release the most expensive cards first - my synapses simply don't care about RTX, not now, and unless the future brings me something worthwhile, probably never.
#5624408
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156348.jpg
Perfs are good but the price is too high. No reason to sell my 1070 other than i could probably sell it near as much as i paid for it 1 year and a half ago which is kind of sad to be honest. AMD must release something good soon to put pressure on nVidia. I bought a Ryzen 7 1800x in 2017 for 440$ CAD. So i bought a high end consumer CPU for pretty much the price of this entry level GPU. Yeah i know it performs as well as the 1070 but it's still the cheapest 20xx series GPU you can buy so entry level. Gonna keep my 1070 for a while even if it's not able to achieve 144fps at 2k most of the time without sacrificing image quality. At least nVidia woke up and will now support Freesync.

Next Page