GeForce 362.00 WHQL driver download

#5238100

fantaskarsef

2016-03-01 15:00

See also HERE for additional driver discussion.

#5238157

hexaae

2016-03-01 16:07

Sigh 6 months of just Game Ready drivers... And Windows 10 dx12 and WDDM2.0 are still badly supported by these Win7 hacked drivers.

#5238203

Deasnutz

2016-03-01 17:21

Sigh 6 months of just Game Ready drivers... And Windows 10 dx12 and WDDM2.0 are still badly supported by these Win7 hacked drivers.

It is lame. I don't expect Nvidia to fully support dx12 for a long time. Anything that can improve performance other than a new gpu is bad for Nvidia.

#5238212

Denial

2016-03-01 17:34

Sigh 6 months of just Game Ready drivers... And Windows 10 dx12 and WDDM2.0 are still badly supported by these Win7 hacked drivers.

It is lame. I don't expect Nvidia to fully support dx12 for a long time. Anything that can improve performance other than a new gpu is bad for Nvidia.

I don't get it, what kind of support are you looking for? What do you mean by "fully support"? Fable Legends, Ashes and now Gears all run relatively well on Nvidia's hardware. What more support are they supposed to give?

#5238232

Deasnutz

2016-03-01 18:18

I don't get it, what kind of support are you looking for? What do you mean by "fully support"? Fable Legends, Ashes and now Gears all run relatively well on Nvidia's hardware. What more support are they supposed to give?

The type AMD is giving and is poised to continue. I can't argue with the bare minimum you are touting. Save it for a fanboy.

#5238242

Denial

2016-03-01 18:31

The type AMD is giving and is poised to continue. I can't argue with the bare minimum you are touting. Save it for a fanboy.

AMD practically wrote the specification for DX12 and even they are having problems. Look at Async support in AoS on the Fury X, it scales negatively at 1080p. Or look at the recent V-Sync problem they are having in AoS shown in Guru3D's review and now confirmed by PC Perspective. Or today, they released GoW Ultimate Edition and the performance on AMD's cards across the board is an issue. And this isnt even to say that AMD' support is bad, it's fine. The Gears issue is probably in conjunction with MS and the other issues are all probably easily fixable. But you guys make it sound like Nvidia cards are unusable or something in Windows 10. So I ask again, exactly what support Nvidia is currently lacking and how exactly is that support in anyway meaningful to the overall user experience?

#5238249

GeniusPr0

2016-03-01 18:46

Nice, glad to see async support enabled

#5238283

fantaskarsef

2016-03-01 19:44

And here we are again.... :bang:

#5238291

Denial

2016-03-01 20:04

And here we are again.... :bang:

Yeah, I reported him.

#5238323

GeniusPr0

2016-03-01 21:10

Yeah, I reported him.

I would advise to not visit the nvidia forums.

#5238354

Deasnutz

2016-03-01 21:55

AMD practically wrote the specification for DX12 and even they are having problems. Look at Async support in AoS on the Fury X, it scales negatively at 1080p. Or look at the recent V-Sync problem they are having in AoS shown in Guru3D's review and now confirmed by PC Perspective. Or today, they released GoW Ultimate Edition and the performance on AMD's cards across the board is an issue. And this isnt even to say that AMD' support is bad, it's fine. The Gears issue is probably in conjunction with MS and the other issues are all probably easily fixable. But you guys make it sound like Nvidia cards are unusable or something in Windows 10. So I ask again, exactly what support Nvidia is currently lacking and how exactly is that support in anyway meaningful to the overall user experience?

Wait, they are having problems with a new feature that has never been used on the platform on a game not even released a day? Shocking. At least they offer the feature, instead of a fake version only to stick "dx12 compatible" on a box.

#5238379

GeniusPr0

2016-03-01 22:30

Wait, they are having problems with a new feature that has never been used on the platform on a game not even released a day? Shocking. At least they offer the feature, instead of a fake version only to stick "dx12 compatible" on a box.

I've already abandoned ship. Sold my desktop. If only AMD kept up on the mobile side. Hoping Polaris will do well otherwise it's Pascal mobile for me.

#5238498

Artefact

2016-03-02 01:41

Almost one year will pass and still no directx12 wddm 2.0 driver for fermi gtx 400 and 500....nvidia this is very disappointing :3eyes:

#5238500

scipio

2016-03-02 01:49

Hey mr nuts please post in the pub...

#5238505

Artefact

2016-03-02 02:00

I had write post in nvidia latest driver tread,so i dont see any issue. Latest driver and still does not have dx12 wddm 2.0 why nvidia ignore 10 percent of global users,they had promise support for Fermi :3eyes:

#5238526

Irenicus

2016-03-02 03:27

Almost one year will pass and still no directx12 wddm 2.0 driver for fermi gtx 400 and 500....nvidia this is very disappointing :3eyes:

Wait, you're expecting new Direct X architecture to work on 4 and 5 series nvidia cards? Ummmm :bang:

#5238527

Artefact

2016-03-02 03:39

Wait, you're expecting new Direct X architecture to work on 4 and 5 series nvidia cards? Ummmm :bang:

They had promise dx12 wddm 2.0 and still ignoring gtx 400 and 500 users, we have basic dx12 hardware support. Even Vulkan api can work but nvidia refuse to give :3eyes:

#5238547

Irenicus

2016-03-02 04:25

They had promise dx12 wddm 2.0 and still ignoring gtx 400 and 500 users, we have basic dx12 hardware support. Even Vulkan api can work but nvidia refuse to give :3eyes:

I just find it strange, I mean those cards are getting pretty old now, I wouldn't expect anyone to even attempt to run more modern games on them at decent frame rates. You'd be better off even with a 6xx series card and those don't have dx12 support either. Maybe I'm just misinformed. If they have indeed promised dx12 support from them, then that blows that they haven't delivered