Gainward, Palit and ASUS GeForce GTX 1650 Photos surface

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Gainward, Palit and ASUS GeForce GTX 1650 Photos surface on our message forum
#5658626
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/163/163032.jpg
The Asus one is just absurdly long. It's not needed to be that long. Why do manufacturers have to have long cards when they don't have to? Why? Seriously?
#5658629
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
I think passive cooled one should be possible..... regardless It's a pointless product...
#5658707
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262182.jpg
skip this not sense gpu... no gddr6... low transistor count... no new tecnology no tensor core... 1660 ti can make some sense... only die shrink!!!
#5658710
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156348.jpg
I really thought this product was an April fool. Apparently it is not 😕
#5658718
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
Clawedge:

The Asus one is just absurdly long. It's not needed to be that long. Why do manufacturers have to have long cards when they don't have to? Why? Seriously?
It's not that long. Not like it matters anyway, it'll still be shorter than just about any mobo you put it on. I'm more bothered by the fact they're all dual-slot, which just unnecessarily limits it as an option for ultra-SFF builds.
#5658787
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/252/252776.jpg
Nerboruto:

skip this not sense gpu... no gddr6... low transistor count... no new tecnology no tensor core... 1660 ti can make some sense... only die shrink!!!
I disagree, I know someone who's PC is some thin client he was given by a friend. No PCI-express power coming from the power supply. So this would be about the best card he can use with his current setup.
#5658938
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238382.jpg
What is the memory bus width for 1650?
#5658973
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262182.jpg
The Reeferman:

I disagree, I know someone who's PC is some thin client he was given by a friend. No PCI-express power coming from the power supply. So this would be about the best card he can use with his current setup.
for those who already own a 950/1050 etc. .. it's a bad upgrade .. they had put at least the gddr6 or a bus larger than 128bit or new technology .. even with a 750 ti well overclocked I will not upgrade. for those who buy a new machine is ok. but it is still too expensive for what it offers.
#5659027
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236670.jpg
KissSh0t:

What is the memory bus width for 1650?
128
#5659293
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/252/252776.jpg
Nerboruto:

for those who already own a 950/1050 etc. .. it's a bad upgrade.
I agree but if you have a GT630 with DDR3 memory it's a nice upgrade. Too expensive, sure. 128bit bus? 256 bit would probably make it need extra power.
#5659354
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/197/197287.jpg
We don't even know the full performance of the card and people are already saying "pointless card don't buy" lol like really people, y'all must know the future right? Let me guess, you're all comparing it to the leak, this one specifically: https://i.imgur.com/qcpjrGF.png While completely ignoring this one https://i.imgur.com/rVbEfnf.png Makes sense, lets bash stuff before they are out and make opinions about them before we really know anything about them. Lets just base stuff on unknown variables and stats that don't make sense, either one you look at. Then there's this one that puts it close to GTX 1060 3GB levels https://www.lowyat.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/bf5367e4-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1650-leak-image-benchmark-3dmark-11.jpg All i'll say is that if the GTX 1650 turns out to be close to the GTX 1060 3GB performance, then that's not bad, it's not great, but there's a fair gap between the GTX 1060 3GB and 1050 ti
#5659674
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238382.jpg
Aura89:

We don't even know the full performance of the card and people are already saying "pointless card don't buy" lol like really people, y'all must know the future right? Let me guess, you're all comparing it to the leak, this one specifically: https://i.imgur.com/qcpjrGF.png While completely ignoring this one https://i.imgur.com/rVbEfnf.png Makes sense, lets bash stuff before they are out and make opinions about them before we really know anything about them. Lets just base stuff on unknown variables and stats that don't make sense, either one you look at. Then there's this one that puts it close to GTX 1060 3GB levels https://www.lowyat.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/bf5367e4-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1650-leak-image-benchmark-3dmark-11.jpg All i'll say is that if the GTX 1650 turns out to be close to the GTX 1060 3GB performance, then that's not bad, it's not great, but there's a fair gap between the GTX 1060 3GB and 1050 ti
Not a bad little card at all, sitting between RX 570 and 580 is pretty darn good..... and doing it with a 128bit memory bus width, I'm impressed.