#6110492

H83

2023-03-10 15:31

8000Mhz?! Now that`s fast!

#6110498

Undying

2023-03-10 15:56

H83:

8000Mhz?! Now that`s fast!

And expensive. 😛

#6110575

Bender82

2023-03-10 21:31

hmm maybe that explains why we don't see 64GB kit hitting 8000 mhz without oc, it's a way to save and raise the price at the same time

#6110576

JJayzX

2023-03-10 21:33

I wonder how this would work with AMD 7000 cause you could do 1:1:2, fclock:uclock:memclock. I know they say its better for uclock and mem clock to be matched versus fclock but this evens it a bit.

#6110583

tsunami231

2023-03-10 22:07

rather fast and expensive, though i never understood why cpu use 4GHZ when talking about 4000MHZ but ram still dont, it cant be cause 4000mhz look bigger if that is case cpu maker should be using that too, less i missing something or use conversion wrong

#6110747

FlyBy

2023-03-11 19:30

tsunami231:

rather fast and expensive, though i never understood why cpu use 4GHZ when talking about 4000MHZ but ram still dont, it cant be cause 4000mhz look bigger if that is case cpu maker should be using that too, less i missing something or use conversion wrong

It's completely off anyways, it's not 6000 or 8000MHz with RAM, it's MT's and NOT MHz, just no one cares. Frequency x2 = MT . But who wants a 3GH or 4GHz DDR5 kit when you can enjoy a 6000MHz or 8000MHz offer. Ads lie, try to fool you and only want your best, your money.