3DMark TimeSpy DirectX 12 Benchmark Review

#5306347

Odellot

2016-07-15 05:47

Here's Mine... Time Spy Result http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/1uiwd7.jpg

#5306348

Nima V

2016-07-15 05:48

This true DX12 benchmark its to prove that GCN is better in DX12... The powerful 1070 is only 10% better than the FuryX. The upcoming VEGA will eat 10XX cards at coffee

This benchmark proved Pascal GPUs can gain performance with DX12 and asynchronous compute unlike some other DX12 games that were only optimized for AMD.

#5306354

hsjj3

2016-07-15 06:15

Guru needs to show Graphics Score, that powerful mega Intel CPU heavily skews the overall score upwards.

#5306391

xIcarus

2016-07-15 08:33

Got a 4913 on a 7970ghz Crossfire and a 4930K. The longevity of GCN is amazing. These cards are from the the GTX 680 days. Who's laughing now about my 3gigs of vram that "will never be used before the cards are obsolete".? GPU score was a 4609.

Yeah well who could have predicted AMD was going to rebrand that card for 2 more generations? That's the main reason for its longevity, AMD can't afford to not support it properly. Awesome for the consumer however.

#5306392

Kaarme

2016-07-15 08:34

This benchmark proved Pascal GPUs can gain performance with DX12 and asynchronous compute unlike some other DX12 games that were only optimized for AMD.

Considering Maxwells were still dx11 GPUs, how do you suppose studios would have made Nvidia dx12 optimised games when there were no Nvidia dx12 GPUs around? Nvidia optimised games were consequently dx11 games. Now it might change for 1060-1080. Assuming it's not too complicated and thus not yet worth the time and money.

#5306393

xIcarus

2016-07-15 08:36

Considering Maxwells were still dx11 GPUs, how do you suppose studios would have made Nvidia dx12 optimised games when there were no Nvidia dx12 GPUs around? Nvidia optimised games were consequently dx11 games. Now it might change for 1060-1080. Assuming it's not too complicated and thus not yet worth the time and money.

Maxwell2 supports more DX12 features than GCN4 (Polaris). What are you on about? And ironically Intel Skylake's iGPU supports more than both.

#5306402

ultraex2003

2016-07-15 08:57

i think cfx is broken low skor for 2 x290 5820k @ 4.0 2x290 http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc242/ultraex2003/post-238528-0-93851000-1468535124.jpg

#5306407

PNeV

2016-07-15 09:09

Have too say, not bad a for a almost 5 year old GPU. Wish I still had my Fury X. http://i.imgur.com/sMzzf3Kh.jpg

I may get my Vega one when it turns up, seeing all these high scores with new cards is making me want to upgrade!

#5306451

Odellot

2016-07-15 11:26

Tested using Our Family PC..:D http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/921/A3B8qD.png

#5306462

Slikar

2016-07-15 11:44

Glad i sold my Maxwell, it's ridiculous how they could even market them as capable of dx12.

#5306467

Kaarme

2016-07-15 11:48

Maxwell2 supports more DX12 features than GCN4 (Polaris). What are you on about?

Sure, on paper. But it doesn't show much in practice, does it? It's still 100% dx11 optimised GPU with dx12 features slapped on top for marketing purposes. Dx12 wasn't yet a thing when Maxwell was designed, and Nvidia lives only for today, not tomorrow.

#5306470

Redemption80

2016-07-15 11:49

Maxwell cards are doing really well, the only DX12 feature they can't do is async compute. They support more features in reality, not just on paper. Just not the feature with all the hype behind it, while the features they do support have yet to be used by devs.

#5306475

BrimStone101

2016-07-15 11:54

DX12 performs poorly against vulkan I score 4200 single 290 card graphics score 4255 cpu score 4118 test 1 28.33 fps test 2 23.65 fps

#5306488

Wolf9an9

2016-07-15 12:08

@ OP TDurden and Tj TDurden, this is not free with the basic version and requires the advanced version! Tj, did you get it working with the basic version?

#5306490

Redemption80

2016-07-15 12:14