3DMark TimeSpy DirectX 12 Benchmark Review
Click here to post a comment for 3DMark TimeSpy DirectX 12 Benchmark Review on our message forum
danhaf
I pushed my Titan to the limit...
3DMark Score 6011
Graphics Score 5735
CPU Score 8272
Graphics Test 1 37.87 fps
Graphics Test 2 32.51 fps
CPU Test 27.79 fps
BuildeR2
Scores with my exact profile clocks, no kamikaze for this one.
Score = 5469
Graphics = 5561
CPU = 5001
Ran this on 365.19's, so it said not approved. Will run later when a driver with new Vulkan comes out for 980Ti.
gringopig
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/15920
Using driver 368.69
http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u311/gringopig/Untitled%20picture_zpspgq03ppt.png
BuildeR2
Just a warning, watch CPU temps guys. Normally after ~4 hours of Fallout 4 or GTAV my CPU peak would be 62C, after the CPU test in Time Spy all cores peaked at 78C and my fans spun up louder than I have ever heard before. Wonder if it uses AVX or something.
Vipu2
-Tj-
nvm, seems to be bundled with advanced edition 😀
https://s6.postimg.org/r2ley2qu5/nvm_lol.png
well 3dmark physics can be tough. 😯c:
Try 3dmark vantage physics test or 3dmark skydiver physics test.. These two are the hottest so far.
kx11
how did they record the benchmark demo ?? i couldn't do it
-Tj-
Ah its just basic version, still ok though.. Thought its not going to be that either. 🤓
@ factory OC 1418MHz/ vram 7220MHz; cpu 4.7GHz
https://s6.postimg.org/5hgcagu3l/3dmark_dx12_stock_1418.png
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13211014?
EDIT:
rouge run, it driver crashed later when it switched back to desktop for physics test lol
1480mhz/vram +300mhz offset
Graphics Score
6109
Graphics Test 1
40.37 fps
Graphics Test 2
34.61 fps
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13212197?
MacHodor
i5 6600K 4.5GHz
Corsair LPX 16GB 3200MHz
MSI Z170A GAMING PRO CARBON
MSI Gaming X GTX 1070 @max 1126mhz, +350 memory clock
SCORE 6037
Graphics Score 6438]
Redemption80
https://s32.postimg.org/v6o689bb9/3_D_Mark.jpg
Not brilliant, but CPU and GPU at stock and only the one card.
Still got the GPU's at stock as is the CPU with HT disabled, will rerun tomorrow with the GPU's overclocked and the CPU pulled out of HTPC mode.
https://s31.postimg.org/sqfgrx96z/3_D_Mark_SLI.jpg
Very impressive scaling imho.
Agonist
Have too say, not bad a for a almost 5 year old GPU.
Wish I still had my Fury X.
http://i.imgur.com/sMzzf3Kh.jpg
Srsbsns
Got a 4913 on a 7970ghz Crossfire and a 4930K. The longevity of GCN is amazing. These cards are from the the GTX 680 days. Who's laughing now about my 3gigs of vram that "will never be used before the cards are obsolete".?
GPU score was a 4609.
Q6600
2930....
Graphics 2240 770 running 1264 on the core
CPU 3867
Time for a new 1070 lol
MainFrame Alpha
just got done :infinity:
OC the 980 Ti to its limit, CPU @4Ghz
Score: 5 473
GPU: 6212
CPU: 3271
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13213640?
🤓
Sasquatch
EDIT: Got mine working.
3642 with spec's in signature.
leszy
I wonder which recommendation they were using? They are quite opposed between NV and AMD. Benchmarks of the DX12 games do not quite coincide with the results of Time Spy.
https://developer.nvidia.com/dx12-dos-and-donts
Borys
Amd is strong
This true DX12 benchmark its to prove that GCN is better in DX12...
The powerful 1070 is only 10% better than the FuryX.
The upcoming VEGA will eat 10XX cards at coffee
PhazeDelta1
PhazeDelta1
cpu overclocked to 4.8ghz
gpu and vram overclocked to 1492Mhz/3758Mhz
http://i.imgur.com/L4ZyOno.png
zimzoid
GPU score 5368 here, gpu at default clocks, cpu at 4200mhz