#5971991

Undying

2021-12-10 16:14

Game benchmark does not do justice to amd cards. Game runs much smoother.

#5971992

ibizadr

2021-12-10 16:19

I'm with a gsync monitor and gsync active in nvcp but in game only let me put my fps capped to my refresh rate monitor(165hz) what the best way to capped fps to 60. Using rtss or via nvcp?

#5971995

Kool64

2021-12-10 16:37

ibizadr:

I'm with a gsync monitor and gsync active in nvcp but in game only let me put my fps capped to my refresh rate monitor(165hz) what the best way to capped fps to 60. Using rtss or via nvcp?

go into options and set your frame rate. My 144hz monitor can to 144, 72, and 48 so yours should be close to 60 that way. I use 72 on my 2070s with my 1440p monitor.

#5972006

kanenas

2021-12-10 17:12

Undying:

Game benchmark does not do justice to amd cards. Game runs much smoother.

true

#5972008

kanenas

2021-12-10 17:19

5600x@4900,6800@+MorePowerTool,ddr4 3200@3733 graphics settings Extreme +

#5972009

kapu

2021-12-10 17:20

kanenas:

true

Looks like deliberately made so.... Conspiracy theories

#5972012

ibizadr

2021-12-10 17:23

Kool64:

go into options and set your frame rate. My 144hz monitor can to 144, 72, and 48 so yours should be close to 60 that way. I use 72 on my 2070s with my 1440p monitor.

You can use 72,48 hz because you have v sync on in game options, but this option with g sync on give a little amount of input lag, so I will go to cap fps with external method. Maybe rtss since some users say the input lag it's almost neglegible with this method and g sync.

#5972013

kanenas

2021-12-10 17:24

kapu:

Looks like deliberately made so.... Conspiracy theories

Both companies have better in-game numbers from the benchmark

#5972016

Undying

2021-12-10 17:27

kanenas:

true

I heard some of the reviews mention it. Ingame benchmark favor nvidia but the gameplay they are comparable.

#5972017

kapu

2021-12-10 17:27

kanenas:

Both companies have better in-game numbers from the benchmark

But the difference is lower. In benchmark r6800 perform below expected performance.

#5972021

Undying

2021-12-10 17:31

kapu:

But the difference is lower. In benchmark r6800 perform below expected performance.

It was the same story with fc6 where amd performed better with ingame benchmark but ingameplay not so much.

#5972028

FranciscoCL

2021-12-10 17:42

"Forza Horizon 5 PC will be included to our graphics card benchmark suite as a Raytracing title" "Our main test will be raytrace based" This game does not use Raytracing while "playing" (driving your car), only in Forzavista/garage (showcase of cars). So, I don't think it is a good candidate to include it as a Raytraced game in benchmark suite. There is a mod to add it to the actual in-game: https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2021-forza-horizon-5-in-game-ray-tracing-mod

#5972029

cucaulay malkin

2021-12-10 17:46

when have benchmarks been representative of anything here are some actual in game ones https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Forza-Horizon-5-Spiel-73350/Specials/PC-Release-Benchmark-Test-Steam-Systemanforderungen-1382783/4/ https://www.purepc.pl/test-wydajnosci-forza-horizon-5-pc-piekna-grafika-i-niskie-wymagania-sprzetowe-czyli-prawdziwy-optymalizacyjny-rodzynek?page=0,8 [SPOILER]



[/SPOILER]

#5972033

alanm

2021-12-10 17:54

For anyone saying game is smoother on one brand vs the other, didnt anyone read the review? Frame time analysis pretty clear here: https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/forza_horizon_5_pc_graphics_performance_benchmark_review,8.html

#5972046

kanenas

2021-12-10 19:11

same settings as HH cpu and gpu overclocked

#5972085

GamerNerves

2021-12-10 22:18

I would prefer the results without raytracing as they are more valubale for the vast majority. Even if I would own a powerful raytracing capable GPU, I doubt I would enable the visuals, but the next generation GPUs might already change this, more likely the Lovelace series though.

#5972099

Odarnok

2021-12-10 23:12

GamerNerves:

I would prefer the results without raytracing as they are more valubale for the vast majority. Even if I would own a powerful raytracing capable GPU, I doubt I would enable the visuals, but the next generation GPUs might already change this, more likely the Lovelace series though.

Ray tracing works very well with current cards (RTX 30 and RX 6000) and compatible previous generation cards (RTX 20). Clearly, there is no need to wait for the next generation of graphics cards.

#5972120

kapu

2021-12-11 01:55

kanenas:

same settings as HH cpu and gpu overclocked

Hello clone system 🙂 maybe gona test tomorrow 🙂

#5972167

Ryu5uzaku

2021-12-11 10:11

I actually run on avg 100+ fps on 5120x1440p all maxed in this game with my 3900x + 6800xt

#5972201

BeZol

2021-12-11 12:41

Forza Horizon 5 benchmarks I made: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 0.936V @4GHz 2x16GB DDR4 3600MHz CL14-15-15 @1.47V SAM/Resize Bar Enabled ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 3080 Ti --> FH5 4K Extreme --> 83fps (CPU-Render fps is terrible...) GPU 2115MHz, Memory +1000 https://cdn.prohardver.hu/dl/upc/2021-12/40585_fh5_4k_extreme_rog_strix_tune3.jpg PowerColor Red Devil RX 6900 XT --> FH5 4K Extreme --> 91fps GPU 2675-2775MHz, Memory 2150MHz Fast Timing https://cdn.prohardver.hu/dl/upc/2021-11/40585_fh5_4k_extreme_2650_2750_2.jpg PowerColor Red Devil Ultimate RX 6900 XT --> FH5 4K Extreme --> 100fps GPU 2885-2985MHz, Memory 2154MHz Fast Timing https://cdn.prohardver.hu/dl/upc/2021-12/40585_fh5_4k_extreme_2885_2985.jpg All 3 benchmarks settings are only benchmark-stable. For stable playing calculate with -1-2 fps. (I played 33 hours with the red devil 6900 xt at 2650-2750MHz, which is 89-90fps in the benchmark)