First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear

Published by

Click here to post a comment for First Leaked GeForce GTX 1080 3DMark Benchmarks Appear on our message forum
#5272493
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
Is it a way to give the info you can't share legally yet Hilbert? haha! 🤓 If it's true, it's impressive. As expected.
#5272496
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/116/116345.jpg
If the 1080 gets 26.5k in 3dmark Firestrike it might be my next card.
#5272501
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
If the 1080 gets 26.5k in 3dmark Firestrike it might be my next card.
It's suggest a possible 20/22% headroom for Overclock on 1080. Seems legit.
#5272508
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
Doesnt look that impressive actually. An OC 980ti is pretty close to a stock 1080. 20021(980ti OC) vs 21828(stock 1080)
#5272518
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Doesnt look that impressive actually. An OC 980ti is pretty close to a stock 1080. 20021(980ti OC) vs 21828(stock 1080)
The performance delta is almost twice the gap that the 980 was from the 780Ti. The only thing that sucks is that they are trying to charge $700 for it with the founders edition. I doubt many, if any cards are going to go for a $600 MSRP. In the past reference models were there to keep the price point of higher models in check. Now that's gone. I personally don't find the card worth it for $700.
#5272521
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180832.jpg
Moderator
it will probably cost €750 here lol
#5272530
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/207/207671.jpg
700$? Nope. 600$ at most. I'll stick to the 1070 then. Sucks that the video card alone is becoming the price of an entire desktop PC (minus the video card).
#5272534
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
Doesnt look that impressive actually. An OC 980ti is pretty close to a stock 1080. 20021(980ti OC) vs 21828(stock 1080)
Actually from my 3DMark FS scores and others, over at OC.net, the stock GTX 1080 score is almost identical to a 1560MHz/8000MHz 980Ti. - i7 5820K @ 4.75GHz - 980ti GB Xtreme Windforce @ 1565 / 2049 - Score: 19069 Graphics: 21833 - Date (1/21/2016) http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/10387773 So we can conclude that an OCed 980Ti@1550-1560MHz is offering stock GTX 1080 performance, as we already had assume from the first leaked 3DMark score of the GTX 1080. Atleast in the synthetic 3DMark Firestrike benchmark that is.
#5272537
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/241/241896.jpg
i was under the impression that the 1080 is to be near double performance of a 980ti ,or have i got my wires crossed somewhere .
#5272538
data/avatar/default/avatar11.webp
I was getting a tad higher graphics score with two overclocked 970s in SLI. One can get two of these second hand for the price of a new 1070 (give or take), at least in my country of residence. I sold the 970s to get Pascal, but it doesn't look like it's gonna pay out...
#5272543
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/38/38873.jpg
The card seems with in what Nvidia feed us each gen, stock seems about 30% faster than the GTX980Ti, if i didn't had the GTX980Ti i would be all over this, but im going to wait for the GTX1080Ti, but i have my doubts into if there will be any.... if AMD doesn't release anything that rivals the GTX1080.
#5272545
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
i was under the impression that the 1080 is to be near double performance of a 980ti ,or have i got my wires crossed somewhere .
They said it would be faster then 980 SLI. It would be double the 980Ti in VR, due to simultaneous multi projection.
#5272547
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
I was getting a tad higher graphics score with two overclocked 970s in SLI. One can get two of these second hand for the price of a new 1070 (give or take), at least in my country of residence. I sold the 970s to get Pascal, but it doesn't look like it's gonna pay out...
Well performance wise over OCed GTX 970's, I would only consider the GTX 1080 since even that seems so far as a "side-grade" at best. Which of course I would had taken it in a heartbeat over them for all the known reasons. And as we know almost nothing performance wise about the GTX 1070 but since we already have the GTX 1080 as a baseline, only those coming from single 980/970 and below would benefit from it. And also from AMD comparable one's. Performance wise again I mean. So to the point. Well the GTX 1070 will serve its purpose well according to all the rumors/info we have. But it wouldn't be the best payout. Biggest payout obviously over GTX 970's is the GTX 1080 if you can spare the extra dough.
#5272552
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
The gap between Maxwell/Pascal will probably increase over time with Pascal as games shift more and more over to utilizing compute. Pascal should technically have better compute efficiency and context switching.
#5272578
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
By the time it gets there it will be obsolete anyway.. Volta, Amd Navi.
#5272590
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/256/256969.jpg
Actually from my 3DMark FS scores and others, over at OC.net, the stock GTX 1080 score is almost identical to a 1560MHz/8000MHz 980Ti. - i7 5820K @ 4.75GHz - 980ti GB Xtreme Windforce @ 1565 / 2049 - Score: 19069 Graphics: 21833 - Date (1/21/2016) http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/10387773 So we can conclude that an OCed 980Ti@1550-1560MHz is offering stock GTX 1080 performance, as we already had assume from the first leaked 3DMark score of the GTX 1080. Atleast in the synthetic 3DMark Firestrike benchmark that is.
I wonder how much is related to your CPU oc, pretty sure i can hit 21833 with 4.7Ghz CPU. Already 21420 with 4.5Ghz and 1505Mhz core. edit: Well, i did the test but actually the impact is pretty small from CPU oc, i was expecting more. 4.7Ghz CPU and 1514Mhz Core GPU/7900Mhz memory gave me 21555 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8453809
#5272599
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115462.jpg
Well performance wise over OCed GTX 970's, I would only consider the GTX 1080 since even that seems so far as a "side-grade" at best. Which of course I would had taken it in a heartbeat over them for all the known reasons. And as we know almost nothing performance wise about the GTX 1070 but since we already have the GTX 1080 as a baseline, only those coming from single 980/970 and below would benefit from it. And also from AMD comparable one's. Performance wise again I mean. So to the point. Well the GTX 1070 will serve its purpose well according to all the rumors/info we have. But it wouldn't be the best payout. Biggest payout obviously over GTX 970's is the GTX 1080 if you can spare the extra dough.
You also have to keep in mind that the benchmark score comparison is very relative to real world performance, as few games actually scale with multi-gpu setups like a 3DMark does. Whereas with one card, the performance will always be proportional to that benchmark score in real world scenarios. I've already sold one of my 970s and about to sell the second as soon as I get my hands on an 1080 (or sooner). For me it's definitely not a sidegrade, as I'm really looking forward to not have to deal with SLI anymore. As much as I loved having 2 GPUs for 3 generations, SLI support is worse and worse and apparently with DX12 it won't get any better either. If that changes in the future, I will gladly go back to it. But yes, I definitely agree that prices are overboard, but at least I don't have the urge to buy 2 cards anymore, as I usually did, otherwise this summer would have left me broke for good. :wanker:
#5272624
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231931.jpg
So we can conclude that an OCed 980Ti@1550-1560MHz is offering stock GTX 1080 performance, as we already had assume from the first leaked 3DMark score of the GTX 1080. Atleast in the synthetic 3DMark Firestrike benchmark that is.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7588802 Or bettering it. People with Ti should wait for the 1080ti, 1080 isnt a good upgrade path.
#5272627
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
I wonder how much is related to your CPU oc, pretty sure i can hit 21833 with 4.7Ghz CPU. Already 21420 with 4.5Ghz and 1505Mhz core. edit: Well, i did the test but actually the impact is pretty small from CPU oc, i was expecting more. 4.7Ghz CPU and 1514Mhz Core GPU/7900Mhz memory gave me 21555 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8453809
I could have saved you the trouble.. :P
You also have to keep in mind that the benchmark score comparison is very relative to real world performance, as few games actually scale with multi-gpu setups like a 3DMark does. Whereas with one card, the performance will always be proportional to that benchmark score in real world scenarios. I've already sold one of my 970s and about to sell the second as soon as I get my hands on an 1080 (or sooner). For me it's definitely not a sidegrade, as I'm really looking forward to not have to deal with SLI anymore. As much as I loved having 2 GPUs for 3 generations, SLI support is worse and worse and apparently with DX12 it won't get any better either. If that changes in the future, I will gladly go back to it. But yes, I definitely agree that prices are overboard, but at least I don't have the urge to buy 2 cards anymore, as I usually did, otherwise this summer would have left me broke for good. :wanker:
As I said, I was entirely referring to performance wise. But yeah, totally agree. No one in their right mind would have chosen 970's SLI over GTX 1080. :thumbup:

Next Page