#5238780

SA SYS

2016-03-02 13:33

nice job hh good optimised ... fury in CF is awesome!!!!! but about the game .... i think far cry 2 & 4 & primal are crap games! i want something like far cry 1 . . . cryteck god bless you!

#5238848

xIcarus

2016-03-02 15:26

Holy crap. 980SLI absolutely demolishes FuryCFX in 1440p, but in 4k the FuryCFX destroys 980SLI. I mean I expected a difference, sure, but isn't this abnormal?

#5238858

Keesberenburg

2016-03-02 15:41

Jups thats strance, i think it have to do with vram, nvida gtx 980 ti eats 6gb 1080p and 390x 4,2 al the time what ever the resolution is on that moment. Ithnik Nvida have some memory leak?

#5238933

GeniusPr0

2016-03-02 17:20

Oh my, that CFX Fury setup took almost no hit. It's almost like it was tickled a bit. I wonder if an O/C would make up the <60 avg. Obviously CPU overhead with AMD drivers.

#5238934

GeniusPr0

2016-03-02 17:21

Jups thats strance, i think it have to do with vram, nvida gtx 980 ti eats 6gb 1080p and 390x 4,2 al the time what ever the resolution is on that moment. Ithnik Nvida have some memory leak?

Nothing to do with vRAM. Hilbert covered vRAM. It's to do with AMD's history with CPU overhead.

#5239135

MBTP

2016-03-03 02:21

Nothing to do with vRAM. Hilbert covered vRAM. It's to do with AMD's history with CPU overhead.

CPU overhead? Can't make the relation between vram low consumption and CPU overhead.