EVGA GeForce GTX 780 SC ACX review
Click here to post a comment for EVGA GeForce GTX 780 SC ACX review on our message forum
-Tj-
Nice temp difference, similar to old Fermi GF110 stock vs custom.
Texter
I'm impressed.
Loophole35
Nvidia did it again this looks identical to the 670-680 performance gap (this review proves it as it is like a 670 FTW vs vanilla 680 with the gap of the 780 AVX vs Titan gap) no one of sound mine should pay the premium for the Titan after this.
King4x4
Except people who will game on 1440 surround and then MAYBE we need 6gb.
Can't find any reviews with Vram usage on surround gaming vs one screen to build a complete hypothesis.
I might acutally buy three 780s just to test it!
WhiteLightning
Moderator
now this is a very nice card indeed!
can someone explain this please ?
What is there to look for ?
Does it say on the box which sku it is ?
Lane
PhazeDelta1
WhiteLightning
Moderator
Thx PhazeDelta1
found it on a site with that sku for 680euro.
im gonna wait until its around 600
PhazeDelta1
alanm
Well done Evga. Finally a card that does better in cooling than the exotics like Gigabytes Windforce. I've faulted Evgas poor cooling performance before when they've stuck too often to the ref cooler design. Looks like we have a winner here.
signex
Seems to be the best 780 out there atm.
I hope i can grab one in early June.
Darren Hodgson
Those temperatures are really impressive but it doesn't seem to do much for the card's overclocking potential when the reference cards already overclock well. So basically you're paying a premium for a card that runs cooler but not much else. It isn't even any quieter than a reference card according to Guru3D's review (both are 40 db under load despite the fact the reference card hits 80 C). Also, the new cooling means the card loses the premium looks of the reference card, not that it really matters once it is stuck inside your case.
Loophole35
Darren Hodgson
-Tj-
^
I doubt it, not on that temp and not those clocks.
Reference across the interwebz
Overclocked
Core Clock: 1013MHz (1050mhz)
Boost Clock: 1100~1176MHz (1090mhz)
Custom Gigabyte
Overclocked
Core Clock: 1013MHz (1038mhz)
Boost Clock: 1202MHz (1100mhz)
Custom Evga
Overclocked
Core Clock: 1082MHz (1067mhz)
Boost Clock: up-to 1254MHz (1118mhz)
Speaking of DP, I've just spotted DP performance at anadtech and its similar to 580GTX, that's hell of a crippling lol 😀
http://i.imgur.com/Q8wHIsR.png
Lane
Its even worse if you look their OpenCL benchmark with DP...
It was to expect, they have restrict DP to 1/24 ( like 680).
Now on benchmark who dont forcibly use DP.. things are a bit better. ( at least between 580 > 780 )
( I dont put Luxmark ( who is a no go for Kepler anyway )
http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/5758/54895.png
http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/2645/54896.png
( Will be interesting to get some CUDA results )
Texter
For those interested it's a good idea to dive deep into THG's 2013 workstation charts. THG already had a Titan specific workstation review last month...
-Tj-
GeniusPr0
Well I stand corrected. Those temperatures are absolutely INSANE. What's the weight of the EVGA heatsink?
Rugburn
Cant wait to get my hands on three of these.... With 3gb of vram, I shouldn't run into any issues with triple 1080p 120hz monitors.