#4968607

Veteran

2014-11-28 09:43

Nice, best one one seen, shame its not 120hz.

#4968623

tigermoth

2014-11-28 10:51

Wish people would read. 120 hz is imposable on 1.2 @ 4k it don't have the bandwidth. Req 1.3 display port that isn't out until q1 2015. My turn for a idiotic statement Shame its not 240 hz http://www.tomshardware.com/news/displayport-1.3-vesa,27673.html

#4968664

geogan

2014-11-28 12:39

Nice, best one one seen, shame its not 120hz.

This is not a gaming monitor you muppet. FFS. Don't need 120Hz on a professional production monitor.

#4968672

scatman839

2014-11-28 13:18

Damn veteran, what have you done?

#4968707

JonasBeckman

2014-11-28 14:51

Nice, best one one seen, shame its not 120hz.

Was answered above but we'll get there soon enough, just have to start getting some HDMI 2.0 and/or DisplayPort 1.3 monitors available first to handle the required bandwidth, which also means getting GPU's supporting those standards I suppose. (Not really sure what the current NV 900 and AMD 290 series supports.) Anyway that looks like a really nice screen though probably not something I would get myself due to what it will likely cost. :P

#4968715

southamptonfc

2014-11-28 15:15

You'd need 6 GTX980s in hexaSLI to run FC4 on Ultra @ 120fps at this resolution! (assuming 100% hexaSLI scaling)

#4968769

oyoy

2014-11-28 16:36

Unfortunately, this powerful device won’t be going on sale globally until June or July of 2015 but when it does it might be a highly worthwhile purchase for any serious design professional, despite its expected $4,600 price tag. (4k.com) IMO DP1.3 is a must.

#4968850

Veteran

2014-11-28 18:34

Damn veteran, what have you done?

................. 😱

#4969114

fry178

2014-11-29 02:26

people still dont seem to know the difference between 120Hz on panel vs 120Hz on the signal. a 120Hz screen doesnt need a 120Hz signal to "remove" motion blur.

#4969244

Veteran

2014-11-29 11:54

people still dont seem to know the difference between 120Hz on panel vs 120Hz on the signal. a 120Hz screen doesnt need a 120Hz signal to "remove" motion blur.

I didnt know that, ah well i guess im a idiot then. Cant know everything can you. 😀 Tbh i couldnt give a toss how monitors work and i have no intention to educate myself either as i find it all abit....zzzZZzzz. All i know is when a 4k 120hz IPS monitor appears for sale, i will be one of the first inline to purchase it. As for the meantime, my 120hz IPS Overlord Tempest is doing a fine job at this very moment.

#4969607

kanej2007

2014-11-30 05:06

This screen will be great for watching movies...

#4969611

EspHack

2014-11-30 05:41

people still dont seem to know the difference between 120Hz on panel vs 120Hz on the signal. a 120Hz screen doesnt need a 120Hz signal to "remove" motion blur.

in which case it will add the "soap opera effect" if im not wrong

#4969669

Pete J

2014-11-30 10:11

in which case it will add the "soap opera effect" if im not wrong

Aha! I've always wondered if there was a name for this effect! Absolutely hate it!