EA: Our Games Are Developed for High-end PCs
Click here to post a comment for EA: Our Games Are Developed for High-end PCs on our message forum
Groovy-Music
Battlefield 1, Star Wars Battlefront and Mirror's Edge Catalyst offer great performance for my system... With really responsive and smooth mouse movement. gg
siriq
GTX 580 runs smooth and lag free Battlefield 1 , just like BF4.
Koniakki
Well, as already mentioned if BF1 is anything to go by, I would say they're on the right track. :thumbup:
fantaskarsef
This is hilarious, coming right after their BF1 update introduces the first graphics downgrade I've seen in already released BF games, and also breaks high end PC's use of SLI / CFX setups.
This statement is such rubbish that I'm wondering why it's even worth news on Hilbert's page.
Abc666
Would be nice if they actually started to make great battlefield games again.
The BF series is just a shadow of it self.
ivymike10mt
High-End PC gamming.. Game designed for top PC hardware...
Currently without SLI support in Battlefield 1 :thumbdown (last update was very lame)
sammarbella
Denial
Rich_Guy
[youtube]1irMMs-cBGA[/youtube]
kbx1
"You wonβt see much margin upgrade at all," he said. "We build all of our games to the highest possible spec, which is typically a high-powered PC, and as the consoles come in, [which] may not be the highest spec, we may actually dummy down the console product to meet the spec of the console. In a world where the console looks more and more like a PC, thatβs good for us."
That is good for business (production costs for one game, sales across all platforms) but not necessarily good for gamers because even for minor things like ui you can either make something good for gamepad or for keybord and mouse. I miss old times with true pc exclusive games not ports. Making one game for all platforms is good for business not for gamers. And today reality is proof for that, while the business is good pc gamers recieves bad ports with poor performnace, locked fps, no multi gpu support after release on constant basis.
sammarbella
http://i.imgur.com/ocZhKVY.png
(Direct link to source is not possible, it's a banned source in here, i even edited the image source name to avoid problems...)
EA like Ubi$hit and even CDRprojekt jumped in the graphics downgrade wagon to be "fair" with console gamers.
They can also choose the alternative method MS prefer: ZERO PC optimisation and heavy console engine optimisation directly forced on PC (QB...).
GTX 1080 is a good GPU enjoy it. π
What is ridiculous is to think a single graphically downgraded game mark a trend in PC gaming performance.
Once a game is graphically downgraded 70 FPS at 4K ultra is not so impressive if you need a GTX 1080 to get these numbers.
Try to get that 70fps at 4K ULTRA in another EA "PC friendly" title like Mirror's Edge Catalyst (THIS IS "HIGH", "Ultra" was not so...good):
Darren Hodgson
Denial
screwtech02
mattm4
schmidtbag
Their phrasing was very deliberate:
With a statement like that, they could get away with creating a game that will just barely allow it to run slightly past 60FPS on a rig involving something like an i7 6770 with a GTX 1080.
Sounds pretty scummy, but many companies are already doing that (take Deus Ex for example).
nz3777
I hope you guys don't attack me for what Iam about to say.....My opinion on battlefield 1 it offers no reason for me to even consider wanting to play sorry, world war 1 was the best they can come up with really???Why not do something based on current world events, USA vs Russia in world war 3, special ops Iraq, afganistan, former Yugoslavia, Kosovo, why they choose to go with ww1 I will never understand. It's plain boring to me sorry. Battlefield 3 was by far best chapter in my opinion.
schmidtbag
mattm4
Reardan
Battlefield 1 looks exceptional on a PC, runs extremely well on a wide variety of hardware, has a **** ton of options for graphics, controls, even sound. It should be the example we hold up of a game that can exist well on both consoles and PCs
But all most of you people can do is bitch. It's literally all you're capable of.