I tried..but did I mention it was no live footages? Cause in iRacing u can save the whole race and watch it thru iracing again. Than u can play/rewind/forward/change camera/driver and so on.
I think it should no problem with sync, but I'm no expert..
I didn't yet use mirillis action trail version, but it has that pause feature. I gave it try if it got sync problems..
But thanks for considering its feature..although it is not planned.
Thanks! Love being able to capture using QuickSync. I do have some issues with audio sync trying to edit the files afterwards though, any tips or suggestions there? My workflow is normally capture to AVI, make an AVS script, trim out what I don't need, reencode with MeGUI, upload. Now, since I have to capture to MKV to use QuickSync, this method doesn't keep the audio in sync any more.
My AVS script looks like this:
LoadPlugin("ffms2.dll")
audio=FFAudioSource("capture.mkv")
video=FFVideoSource("capture.mkv", threads=1)
audiodub(video,audio)
I made two videos to illustrate my troubles:
http://youtu.be/5tE2MHakcbghttp://youtu.be/FHINsYAAYfI
Use file indexer (FFMSIndex). MeGUI should even suggest that if you use it to create the avs.
Thanks Unwinder ! On a side note -- I get 12 CPU core temperatures on my 3930, should be only six 🙂
Hyperthreaded CPUs appear to Windows as having twice as many physical cores as they really have. So, yeah: Your 6-core looks like a 12-core to Windows. Go figure 🤓.
Thanks Unwinder ! On a side note -- I get 12 CPU core temperatures on my 3930, should be only six 🙂
Temps are being displayed per each logical processor on Intel CPUs. So for HT logical processors sharing the same physical CPU core temps will be equal and taken from the same DTS. That's done on purpose, displaying CPU usages and CPU temps with different CPU count can be more confusing for users to reconcile physical with logical CPUs and remapping each usage to temperature harder. The way it is now is more readable.
Temps are being displayed per each logical processor on Intel CPUs. So for HT logical processors sharing the same physical CPU core temps will be equal and taken from the same DTS. That's done on purpose, displaying CPU usages and CPU temps with different CPU count can be more confusing for users to reconcile physical with logical CPUs and remapping each usage to temperature harder. The way it is now is more readable.
Now I really do not want to criticise but I think Grendel is right on this one. People who use this are mostly experienced or have the basic know how at least. So I don't think it would be in any way confusing. Maybe just add a little option so that we would be able to turn it to 6 physical cores.(makes the graph more readable) I know that there is already too much to be done, but it would be a nice touch. Anyway, GREAT work once again, looking forward to going home and downloading it.Keep it up buddy!!!
Now I really do not want to criticise but I think Grendel is right on this one. People who use this are mostly experienced or have the basic know how at least. So I don't think it would be in any way confusing. Maybe just add a little option so that we would be able to turn it to 6 physical cores.(makes the graph more readable) I know that there is already too much to be done, but it would be a nice touch. Anyway, GREAT work once again, looking forward to going home and downloading it.Keep it up buddy!!!
That option is already inside, just disable CPU temperature graps for HT processors if you don't need them. And i'd love to beleive that people who use it are mostly experienced, but it is far from reality sadly.
That option is already inside, just disable CPU temperature graps for HT processors if you don't need them. And i'd love to beleive that people who use it are mostly experienced, but it is far from reality sadly.
Oh great, sorry for that comment then.As I wrote I am gonna download it first thing when I come home.Haven't seen it yet myself and thought that Grendel had a look inside before he made that comment. Have to say that now with the quicksync support I am first time jealous of lads who have IGPs on their CPUs. Or am I? 🙂
Altho I think having a temperature for every logical CPU is somewhat confusing for novices, redundant, and in case of a 3930 a bit cluttered w/ 12 temps 😉, I did not mean to imply that it is an error or a problem (after all you always can disable any graph.)
Having that said, I was wondering if there is a chance to see a feature that would allow to display the highest temperature of all cores in the tray ? RealTemp can be configured to do this, very handy while doing CPU taxing jobs on the desktop (no need for a monitoring window.) Would love to retire RealTemp in favor of RT AB 🙂
Cool finally CPU Usage in the OSD....
But as many others already said, having a 3930K with 12 Logical cores gives 12 graphs and 12 rows. What about a "normalized" CPU usage ?
IMHO it's awesome that you have each core, so you can check out if that game supports multi core, and how many, but on the other hand for daily usage i'd prefer a single value you see with a single glance and now how much your CPU is used.
(and i also regrett not having a HD4000 included :banana: )
Cool finally CPU Usage in the OSD....
But as many others already said, having a 3930K with 12 Logical cores gives 12 graphs and 12 rows. What about a "normalized" CPU usage ?
IMHO it's awesome that you have each core, so you can check out if that game supports multi core, and how many, but on the other hand for daily usage i'd prefer a single value you see with a single glance and now how much your CPU is used.
(and i also regrett not having a HD4000 included :banana: )
By overriding the name's group you can regroup CPU informations on a single row.
But it seems not possible to get global CPU usage.
Thank you very much for the job :banana: .. noob question 🤓 : I wanted to ask if you can change the value of Tjmax for my q6600? I know it is 90°C. .. the update for ITA localization will be ready soon... thx 🙂
Yeah, I can understand why that is confusing. MSI needs to supply the SE build themselves which uses a different database.
Once handed out I'll post it. Up-to this moment an SE edition has not yet been released. I'll drop them a mail and see if we can get the new SE build asap.
RTAB 🙂