Download: Maxon Cinebench R20 Benchmark

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Download: Maxon Cinebench R20 Benchmark on our message forum
#5646703
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/106/106401.jpg
I hope this way it's more protected from cheating, since R15 you can make what u like.
#5646705
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/191/191689.jpg
Only available from the Microsoft Store or Apple App store? Pass.
#5646794
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
HWgeek how do you think the R20 fares against the modded R15 EE? Sustained load and score wise etc.
#5646809
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/106/106401.jpg
I am interested to compare the performance gap between current AMD and Intel CPU's to see if the relative performance gap is the same or those new instructions mad Intel/AMD CPU's faster versus old R15. Forcing R15 to render the new R20 scene prompts that there are "Bevel" and "Variation" plugin missing but it can render and it takes double the time vs R20, so like Maxon wrote- R20 renders faster then R15.
#5646972
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270492.jpg
Aorus Xtreme Z390 + 9900K (5GHz/AVX 4.7GHz), Dual Boot - Win 7 : 4764 - Win 10 : 4547 I consistently get little better benchmark results on Win 7 compared to Win 10 (between about +4%/+8%) Both OS/Drivers are up top date.
#5646978
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250418.jpg
Thanks for releasing a zip with the software. Although I could compress the 221MB into 147MB, would save some bandwidth. With an i5 2500k @ 3.7GHz, paired with DDR3 @1.6GHz I got 1054 points.
#5647045
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/245/245459.jpg
Silva:

Thanks for releasing a zip with the software. Although I could compress the 221MB into 147MB, would save some bandwidth. With an i5 2500k @ 3.7GHz, paired with DDR3 @1.6GHz I got 1054 points.
That'll be the lack of hyperthreading that is causing some of the biggest loss there, and the lower frequency probably being the 2nd biggest factor.
#5647164
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/250/250418.jpg
Robbo9999:

That'll be the lack of hyperthreading that is causing some of the biggest loss there, and the lower frequency probably being the 2nd biggest factor.
I tried my old OC @4.0Ghz and got 1162 points. Can't get around an old and ageing CPU. I'm looking forward to Zen2.
#5647286
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259577.jpg
I have a strange behavior, at stock I get around 11300, but at 4Ghz (same oc settings in R15 are working) my monitors are turning off and I have to restart the system. I tried 3.7Ghz and I got a score of about 9300.. .
#5647363
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262241.jpg
danhaf:

I have a strange behavior, at stock I get around 11300, but at 4Ghz (same oc settings in R15 are working) my monitors are turning off and I have to restart the system. I tried 3.7Ghz and I got a score of about 9300.. .
Maybe your 4.0 GHz OC is not really stable with the newer AVX instructions implemented.
#5672746
data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp
Hey Peeps, for the life of me I can't figure out why Cinebench R20 is ignoring my AVX offset. My AVX offset and my AVX-512 offsets both work in other apps like Prime95 and even other rendering engines. I'm running a i9-9940x with an Asus Prime Deluxe II. Syncing all cores to 4.00 with an AVX offset value 3. Prime95 triggers the offset and all threads work at 3.7ghz, but again Cinebench R20 works all threads at 4.00. Is there some hidden setting in Cinebench to get it to use AVX instructions? My Win10 Pro is a fresh and install and my CPU Bios settings are mostly stock except for XMP and the Sync all cores setting. I think stock performance with MCE would normally run all threads at 4.1Ghz. I currently have MCE disabled. I don't know what Intels spec is since they don't publish all core ratios anymore doh. So in short. Can anyone help me get AVX offset to kick in with Cinebench R20? Skype: ianhej Discord: lagauche#1079