#5760367

squalles

2020-02-14 19:46

Branch info?

#5760408

kosta20071

2020-02-14 22:01

Branch 442.37: [ r442-19-4] VS 442.19 [r440_00-289]

#5760433

squalles

2020-02-14 23:13

kosta20071:

Branch 442.37: [ r442-19-4] VS 442.19 [r440_00-289]

excellent, the last 442.19 give me a strange slowdowns in many games, and everything is fine with 442.01 and before, so i will test these newer too

#5760531

Astyanax

2020-02-15 11:38

https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/geforce-hotfix-driver-version-442-37.430745/ dupe thread has been merged into this one

#5760542

dentomanan

2020-02-15 12:24

squalles:

excellent, the last 442.19 give me a strange slowdowns in many games, and everything is fine with 442.01 and before, so i will test these newer too

I confirm that I also started having problems after the update. I hope they fix it as soon as possible.

#5760580

Mineria

2020-02-15 13:54

squalles:

Branch info?

442.19 = r440_00-289 442.37 = r442_19-4

#5760668

-Tj-

2020-02-15 21:06

Mineria:

442.19 = r440_00-289 442.37 = r442_19-4

This further confirms my observations, r440_00 was clearly too bugged. ps: 442.01 is r441_83-5 I'll just stick with 442.01 for now, don't need anything new atm.

#5760737

loracle

2020-02-16 02:50

garbage driver, stick to 442.01 beta, WTH NVIDIA with the last drivers, 442.19 stuttering and weird driver behaviour, and 442.37 huge performance drop, why fucking our GPU'S ?

#5760746

Mineria

2020-02-16 03:17

loracle:

garbage driver, stick to 442.01 beta, WTH NVIDIA with the last drivers, 442.19 stuttering and weird driver behaviour, and 442.37 huge performance drop, why procreating our GPU'S ?

I think that is an issue with your system and not the driver.

#5760750

Astyanax

2020-02-16 03:28

-Tj-:

This further confirms my observations, r440_00 was clearly too bugged.

Thats not how branches work.

#5760768

loracle

2020-02-16 06:15

Mineria:

I think that is an issue with your system and not the driver.

nope all fine with 442.01.

#5760814

nevcairiel

2020-02-16 11:54

Astyanax:

Thats not how branches work.

He'll never understand that. The number is different, therefor it must be vastly different. What the number actually means is irrelevant. 442.19 was based on the r440_00 branch, 442.37 is based on the r442_19 branch - what could that branch name possibly suggest? That its a modification based on top of 442.19, and thus just a minor tweak based ultimately on r440_00? Nooo, can't be possible, it must be its own thing, its a different branch!o_O

#5760817

Astyanax

2020-02-16 12:13

my guess is they are using something like git internally and a rebase merged fixes into the 440 tree and got you that branch number, while the hotfix driver is a standard forward based merge.

#5760818

-Tj-

2020-02-16 12:14

Trolls are priceless. 😛 I know well how they work. Main r44x_00 is not ok, period. No wonder they didn't use it a lot.

#5760919

AntiSnipe

2020-02-16 21:16

So far all good for me with this set.

#5761017

Baldassano

2020-02-17 08:19

Dunno if its just me, but these drivers im noticing vastly different sharpness in far rendering in COD:MW... It seems the .01s were way sharper. I rarely ever revert back to previous drivers unless its a known thing, but tommorow i have to check it out..

#5761024

Astyanax

2020-02-17 08:32

god i love placebo.

#5761252

S3r1ous

2020-02-17 18:53

So far so good.

#5761277

Shadowdane

2020-02-17 20:58

Oh thank god for the RDR2 fix!! On my laptop it would always crash on RDR2 unless I used DX12! Will need to give Vulkan a try again if this fix truly fixed it.

#5761588

NotReallySure

2020-02-18 19:45

Am still getting black screen flashes with firefox, when are they going to fix this...back to 441.41 for me.