Download: GeForce Game Ready 417.35 WHQL drivers

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Download: GeForce Game Ready 417.35 WHQL drivers on our message forum
#5616600
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
GeForce 417.35 WHQL - [ r417_18-14] GeForce 417.22 -[ r417_18-3 ]
#5616609
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/272/272909.jpg
Downloaded and ready for installation! I'll report back for any feedback! 🙂
#5616613
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/174/174022.jpg
[Hitman 2 Silent assassin]: There is flickering texture corruption in the game. [200472315]
U wot m8?
#5616623
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
How many driver releases / hotfixes has Nvidia put out in the last 30 days?
#5616632
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/262/262085.jpg
BF5 runs nice and smooth with these
#5616636
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/272/272918.jpg
JamesSneed:

How many driver releases / hotfixes has Nvidia put out in the last 30 days?
And you'd moan if there was none, its good they are actively improving them.
#5616647
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
JamesSneed:

How many driver releases / hotfixes has Nvidia put out in the last 30 days?
you can choice don´t make the download
#5616649
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
I chose vulkan 417.23 for now, will see how that goes.
#5616665
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
Finally there's proof that DLSS is just an overrated upscaler. Look at all these jaggies on the right. Also Nvidia is comparing 1080Ti running full 4K against 2080Ti running DLSS. Just.... LOL. 😕 🙄 https://abload.de/img/dlss3rcms.png
#5616673
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90026.jpg
TAA seems so ... misty? compared to DLSS All those aa tricks have so many flaws...
#5616674
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/184/184554.jpg
will try these with bf1 ,bf5
#5616688
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/88/88351.jpg
arel77:

will try these with bf1 ,bf5
Will try these because we're masochists. 😛
#5616697
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
GREGIX:

TAA seems so ... misty? compared to DLSS All those aa tricks have so many flaws...
Yep, TAA has a lot of issues. MSAA 4x is better, but the performance hit is a lot higher, so it's all about what you are willing to sacrifice. Personally, 4k + 2x MSAA/FXAA is about as good a balance as I have found.
#5616702
data/avatar/default/avatar07.webp
Glottiz:

Finally there's proof that DLSS is just an overrated upscaler. Look at all these jaggies on the right. Also Nvidia is comparing 1080Ti running full 4K against 2080Ti running DLSS. Just.... LOL. 😕
Finally there's proof? That's exactly what they have said it is all along. It renders multiple times at a lower res, then combines and upscales. That's why the performance and output is about the same as running one step in resolution lower (900p vs 1080p for example) and using MSAA.
#5616709
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/272/272909.jpg
Good drivers so far with obvious improved smoothness. Tried some R6 Siege and the game runs flawless. Going to try more games soon & report back.
#5616710
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
^ This and that TAA is blurry. As with last few, this one is good in BFv for me.
#5616715
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
EdKiefer:

^ This and that TAA is blurry.
Indeed! It looks like 2k instead of 4k. In motion, the DLSS looks much sharper. Weird.
#5616716
data/avatar/default/avatar23.webp
illrigger:

Finally there's proof? That's exactly what they have said it is all along. It renders multiple times at a lower res, then combines and upscales. That's why the performance and output is about the same as running one step in resolution lower (900p vs 1080p for example) and using MSAA.
I know that, but many people didn't believe it's upscaling. I remember Digital Foundry pixel counted DLSS to be 1440p.
dragonlord:

Indeed! It looks like 2k instead of 4k. In motion, the DLSS looks much sharper. Weird.
Hard to say from compressed Youtube video. It might just be bad video compression playing tricks. Or it might be that Nvidia is using some sharpening with DLSS to make image pop. We'll need more in depth analysis. But from that aliasing it's very obvious that DLSS doesn't come close to native 4K look, unlike what Nvidia was claiming at first.
#5616717
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/174/174022.jpg
dragonlord:

Indeed! It looks like 2k instead of 4k. In motion, the DLSS looks much sharper. Weird.
TAA is adding ghosting in motion due to temporal accumulation of samples, DLSS doesn't as there are no temporal component in it, only spatial reconstruction by AI. FFXV is a bad example though as it's TAA implementation seems to be very bad.
Glottiz:

unlike what Nvidia was claiming at first.
Where did NV ever claimed that?
#5616719
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
dr_rus:

Where did NV ever claimed that?
Marketing material for RTX20 series.

Next Page