Dishonored 2 Screenshots Released

#5328012

modjo81

2016-08-30 01:17

lame visual////loks like directx 9 and 2004 games.boringggggggg

#5328013

CPC_RedDawn

2016-08-30 01:33

yup i agree looks like **** those filters though... why on earth devs love to put horrid filters all over the screen

#5328016

Undying

2016-08-30 01:53

I also think they should've stick to Unreal Engine not change it to id tech engine. It does not look that bad guys though, come on.

#5328021

CPC_RedDawn

2016-08-30 02:16

I also think they should've stick to Unreal Engine not change it to id tech engine. It does not look that bad guys though, come on.

the resolution looks bad but its the filters they use to create a "cinematic" feel, just ends up looking washed out and blurry. I, personally, would be ashamed to release those screen shots if I was working on a triple A title.

#5328022

airbud7

2016-08-30 02:17

The first game didn't look all that good but was a load of fun to play...

#5328049

DerSchniffles

2016-08-30 05:13

Looks absolutely stunning and unlike anything else on the market.

I agree, I think it looks great. I am looking forward to this game.

#5328066

JonasBeckman

2016-08-30 06:23

I also think they should've stick to Unreal Engine not change it to id tech engine. It does not look that bad guys though, come on.

It uses some engine of their own creation, I forgot it's name though it does look a little bit like IDTech yes. 🙂 (As does Prey 2 that other game they're working on, unless I got the developers mixed up once again. 😀 )

#5328116

WaroDaBeast

2016-08-30 09:25

lame visual////loks like directx 9 and 2004 games.boringggggggg

So, which games do you have in mind? Got any screenshots?

#5328135

JonasBeckman

2016-08-30 10:02

So, which games do you have in mind? Got any screenshots?

Going by the year of 2004 that would be games like Half-Life 2 and Doom 3 which well looking at them now at least in my memory they looked a lot better than the screenshots I found via for example Steam. 😀 (Attempts at shader effects and techniques such as normal-mapping, parallax, bloom and/or HDR and early soft-shadow attempts were more along 2005 or 2006 as I remember, Crysis 1 of course stands out but was released in 2007 and it has also aged even if you use mods for texture quality and shader improvements.)

#5328170

Undying

2016-08-30 11:17

It uses some engine of their own creation, I forgot it's name though it does look a little bit like IDTech yes. 🙂 (As does Prey 2 that other game they're working on, unless I got the developers mixed up once again. 😀 )

Dishonored 2 Id tech 5, Quake Champions hybrid Id tech engine, Prey 2 Cryengine so some difference there. Only Quake mention Vulcan support tho.

#5328177

ortucis

2016-08-30 11:47

Looks OK. Nothing amazing. Then again, first one also looked OK. Generic cartoon art style doesn't help.

#5328186

Corbus

2016-08-30 12:18

Looks OK. Nothing amazing. Then again, first one also looked OK. Generic cartoon art style doesn't help.

yea,but this one looks a bit more "serious" than the first but still cartoony. That's a good thing(the more serious part).

#5328282

JonasBeckman

2016-08-30 16:18

Dishonored 2 Id tech 5, Quake Champions hybrid Id tech engine, Prey 2 Cryengine so some difference there. Only Quake mention Vulcan support tho.

Right, looks like it's indeed IDTech5 though modified and now called "Void" 🙂 (How much of a difference that makes I guess we'll just have to wait and see but I imagine they've touched up a lot of the aging IDTech5 code depending on how long the game has been in development.)

#5328285

ortucis

2016-08-30 16:21

yea,but this one looks a bit more "serious" than the first but still cartoony. That's a good thing(the more serious part).

Yeah it does look a bit more realistic. I guess they listened to the people who said the art style was **** for the kind of story they were trying to tell (you know, super duper serious lol).