Deus Ex: Mankind Divided PC GPU (DX11 and DX12) performance benchmark review

RotatingFan

2016-08-24 19:38

rofl Who here honestly cares about the dx11 results except people who own nvidia cards. DX12 is what matters this test is MUTE and pointless but no surprise it was tested here.

#5325783

Caesar

2016-08-24 19:41

how it would be ...if anybody was paid $1 to say "hi" to a particular one .... That's where certain games are bundled to specific GPU manufacturers... {OPTIMIZED TO THAT GPU TECH(S)}

#5325784

Denial

2016-08-24 19:42

Who here honestly cares about the dx11 results except people who own nvidia cards. DX12 is what matters this test is MUTE and pointless but no surprise it was tested here.

Uh, how about everyone who is currently playing the game now? The DX12 renderer isn't out until September.

#5325785

cryohellinc

2016-08-24 19:43

Well for people that can wait a bit, i would recommend waiting for dx12 patch, which apparently comes on 5th of September, which should make it 60fps+ on 1440p stable via 1080 / Titan XP. p.s. how could i forget about new drivers which will come on release date.

#5325786

RotatingFan

2016-08-24 19:43

I fully expect more and more dx11 tests done ignoring the new API`s to try and limit the damage of the upcoming AMD hardware that handles dx12 and vulkan so much better due to there inherent nonlinear architecture design.

#5325788

Denial

2016-08-24 19:48

I fully expect more and more dx11 tests done ignoring the new API`s to try and limit the damage of the upcoming AMD hardware that handles dx12 and vulkan so much better due to there inherent nonlinear architecture design.

Yeah, ignoring not because the DX12 renderer isn't out -- it's because it's all some conspiracy against AMD. Can you stop posting nonsense or at least edit your other useless post and add this to it?

#5325789

Undying

2016-08-24 19:50

Im looking forward to dx12 benchmark and comparing the two. Fury X looks impressive.

#5325797

narukun

2016-08-24 20:01

Yeah, ignoring not because the DX12 renderer isn't out -- it's because it's all some conspiracy against AMD. Can you stop posting nonsense or at least edit your other useless post and add this to it?

Just because you dont believe, doesnt mean that other people can't. Everyone can have their own point of view.

#5325801

Dygaza

2016-08-24 20:09

I fully expect more and more dx11 tests done ignoring the new API`s to try and limit the damage of the upcoming AMD hardware that handles dx12 and vulkan so much better due to there inherent nonlinear architecture design.

I don't know if you are totally ignorant, or just trolling. But obiviously DX12 path ain't available for the game yet. Also DX11 tests will still have their place in the near future.

#5325803

Dazz

2016-08-24 20:15

Only on that demo. In real game when you get further in game, AMD cards start getting cpu bottlenecked and nvidia cards start performing better in comparision. Benchmark only shows kinda worst case scenario graphically, but not by cpu load. Still overall, I'm enjoying the game, and there's plenty of option to get fps higher if needed without really sacrificing anything.

True, although benchmarks are really there for worse case scenarios rather than typical game play.

#5325805

Reddoguk

2016-08-24 20:17

I never really take these built in game benchmarks too serious because they are all Reference models only and those of us with G1's or SSC or any other top branded card will totally smash HH's scores. The tests are for reference only as i know for a fact that my card would probably get equal or higher scores than the reference 980Ti in this test. Then again it's hard for me to get a medium between 1440 and 1080 because i still love my old Dell ultrasharp 24" monitor that still to me looks amazing @ 1200p. Still think this is too early even for DX11 because i bet you can add 10-20 extra fps once the game gets proper optimization along with better driver optimization. Not 100% sure if DX11 will even get any optimization but i'll be interested in seeing DX12 results and then see if it gets better over time or not.

#5325808

millibyte

2016-08-24 20:19

Good showing for AMD cards (comparatively) but crappy overall.

#5325819

Primey0

2016-08-24 20:36

RX480 beats GTX1060 once again, but this time in a DirectX11 game. Glad to see that.

Gee I wonder why. Hm maybe because the game and engine favours amd over Nvidia?

#5325822

Undying

2016-08-24 20:39

Gee I wonder why. Hm maybe because the game and engine favours amd over Nvidia?

Still, difference is there, it will probably become even bigger with dx12.

#5325823

primetime^

2016-08-24 20:40

Cant wait for the dx12 follow up!

#5325828

millibyte

2016-08-24 20:49

Still, difference is there, it will probably become even bigger with dx12.

I'm ready for the 480 to beat the 1070 in dx12. I'll laugh...and then I'll cry... 🙂

#5325829

eclap

2016-08-24 20:55

Who here honestly cares about the dx11 results except people who own nvidia cards. DX12 is what matters this test is MUTE and pointless but no surprise it was tested here.

Mute? And yeah, who cares about dx11? Oh, apart from those who bought the game.

#5325830

RotatingFan

2016-08-24 20:56

found one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mHrGi9CfN8

#5325832

RotatingFan

2016-08-24 20:58

wont happen

I'm ready for the 480 to beat the 1070 in dx12. I'll laugh...and then I'll cry... 🙂

Na the 1070 is to strong for the 480. the 1070 is 2 classes above the 480 but the 1060 card is a different matter.

#5325842

Carfax

2016-08-24 21:08

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mHrGi9CfN8

So this guy tests the GTX 1060 vs RX 480 and found the former to beat the latter, and everyone cries foul. Then he does a retest, but with a different CPU that lacks hyperthreading, and now the RX 480 wins, but with inferior minimums :3eyes: How ridiculous is that? If he's going to retest, he should have stuck with his original platform.. 😛uke2: