CORSAIR XENEON FLEX 45-inch Bendable OLED Gaming Monitor Pre-Orders for $1999.99

Published by

Click here to post a comment for CORSAIR XENEON FLEX 45-inch Bendable OLED Gaming Monitor Pre-Orders for $1999.99 on our message forum
#6083938
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282657.jpg
Corsair states 10-bit color gamut on spec site, but display covers only 100% sRGB and 98.5% DCI-P3, it looks like, it is not a true 10-bit display.
#6083980
data/avatar/default/avatar16.webp
brogadget:

Corsair states 10-bit color gamut on spec site, but display covers only 100% sRGB and 98.5% DCI-P3, it looks like, it is not a true 10-bit display.
Bit depth has nothing to do with color gamut. Wider color gamut monitors tend to use higher bit depths to reduce quantization error (e.g. banding). However, there's nothing preventing the use of any color gamut with any bit depth.
#6084186
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
brogadget:

Corsair states 10-bit color gamut on spec site, but display covers only 100% sRGB and 98.5% DCI-P3, it looks like, it is not a true 10-bit display.
OLED panels are 10Bit
#6084188
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
45inch 21:9 is that like two 32inch 16:9 stacked? I had ROG SWIFT PG35VQ for a week and its TINY, like two 27 inch stacked together, unusable, i sent it back to new egg
#6084651
data/avatar/default/avatar10.webp
MegaFalloutFan:

45inch 21:9 is that like two 32inch 16:9 stacked? I had ROG SWIFT PG35VQ for a week and its TINY, like two 27 inch stacked together, unusable, i sent it back to new egg
It seems to be a bit higher, but almost like 2 32' 16:9. Personally I consider that the best dimensions but unfortunately there's almost no other product with them.
#6084689
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
MegaFalloutFan:

45inch 21:9 is that like two 32inch 16:9 stacked? I had ROG SWIFT PG35VQ for a week and its TINY, like two 27 inch stacked together, unusable, i sent it back to new egg
TieSKey:

It seems to be a bit higher, but almost like 2 32' 16:9. Personally I consider that the best dimensions but unfortunately there's almost no other product with them.
I do not think is 2x16:9 monitors stuck together , that would make it into 32:9 no ? Seems more like a 50-55 16:9 inch cropped on top or bottom or a bit of both.
#6085589
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
I feel price is a bit too high. There is enough competition in the space right now that a 2000 dollar mark needs something really good. Bending the monitor is not it. Other options: 1. 27 inch 240Hz OLED by LG, 999 dollars. 2. 42 inch 120Hz OLED (tv) by LG, 780 dollars (prices fluctuate). 3. 34 ultrawide curved 165Hz QD-OLED (Alienware/Samsung), 1099 Dollars. I dont really know "where" the 45 ultrawide fits at twice the price.
#6085609
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268876.jpg
45 inch at 3440p x 1440p. Am I the only thinking that is a very low pixel density for a monitor costing 2 mille? Also I guess that the whole point of bending is the versitility. But ff the aim is then to also watch multimedia content, 1440p is again missing the mark, with most series coming in at 4K 3840 × 2160p, and widescreen movies at 4K 3840 × 1600p.. I'd rather wait for a 42 inch 4K 3840 × 2160p 16:9 OR 38 inch 3840 × 1600p 21:9 O-LED monitor to arrive in that case...
#6093139
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/282/282657.jpg
MegaFalloutFan:

OLED panels are 10Bit
14 or 16bit LUT?
#6093341
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132389.jpg
MegaFalloutFan:

45inch 21:9 is that like two 32inch 16:9 stacked? I had ROG SWIFT PG35VQ for a week and its TINY, like two 27 inch stacked together, unusable, i sent it back to new egg
No, it's like a 16:9 panel + ~1/3rd more width. "21:9" panels are 21.5:9, 3440x1440, and I can tell you that's way too low res for a 45" 21.5:9 panel. I have a 34.18" one and that's the same height as a 27" 16:9 1440p panel, and IMO that's the largest that density should go. Beyond that the pixels are too obvious for me.