Core i9-7980XE 18-core Benchmarks
Click here to post a comment for Core i9-7980XE 18-core Benchmarks on our message forum
CrazY_Milojko
All I have to say is: thank you Threadripper 🙂
On the other side just look at those specs: 165W and $2000 price tag, guess/hope small AC is shipped with this thing to keep it cool.
Kaarme
Intel probably doesn't see such a huge market for monsters like this that it's more profitable to try to get lots of money from the few than little money from... the few. Their goal probably was to beat TR, and they did manage that. Now those that want the most powerful regardless of the price can get this.
BigMaMaInHouse
Let them, Thanks to this 18C inte "Beast" AMD gonna have to release the 20/24/32 (1970x/1980x/1990XT imo) cores TR in future 🙂, and that will be checkmate on X399 vs X299 socket.
Ryu5uzaku
alanm
Looks kind of funny. 36 CPU utilization graphs in task manager.
Silva
David Lake
I'm confuzed, I dont see the 7980 on any of those charts?
Oh got it! I did just get out of bed.
Ricepudding
CrazY_Milojko
Intel pages it said this puppy is 165W. Kinda weird that 14c/28t 7940X has the TDP same as 18c/36t 7980XE.
Yep, completely agree with you about "thanking AMD", nothing more to add. Next hi-end build on my side is going to be AMD no doubt about that. Sadly but 10 years behing all of my gaming/work rigs at work and home were Intel based except one office PC back in 2008 and my daughter's gaming PC at home, those were AMD based, not that I'm happy about this facts.
Btw on JamesSneed
CrazY_MIlojko, The 500Mhz base clock difference is keeping the TDP the same.
Misha Engel
Nice benchmarks my i9-7980XE runs at 9 GHz and I have nothing to prove it....
Cinebench R15 Multi.
http://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu_benchmark-cinebench_r15_multi_core-8
Threadripper 1950X 3151 $1.000 3,151 p/$ 16x3,7 GHz all-core
Core i9-7900x 2194 $ 1.000 2,194 p/$ 10x4 GHz all-core
Core i9-7980xe 3455 $ 2.000 1,77 p/$ 18x3,4 GHz all-core
EPYC 7401p 4208 $ 1.100 3,825 p/$ 24x2,8 GHz all-core
I don't know how seriously we have to take cpu-monkey but it looks a lot more credible then the numbers I saw in this article.
And the winner is.... EPYC 7401p
BangTail
Very nice, now we just need EVGA to get their f**king X299 Dark motherboard out the door 😉
JamesSneed
Look at that last task manager screen with the frequency, all cores are under load that should not be boost speeds. I'm pretty sure this was from a 4.2Ghz OC on all cores. Thoughts?
DDRSAM
AMD won the Price Battle but Intel won the Performance War
Kaerar
Until the 24/28/32c ThreadRipper's arrive...
Intel's process allows a maximum of 28c currently and I doubt they'd be able to market that for less than $10K going on their current pricing scheme. 32c TR4 though An optimistic $2.5K 😀
Misha Engel
schmidtbag
Is there any source saying there will be 32c TR or is this just what people are hoping? A 32c TR would cannibalize their Epyc sales, and I don't really see the benefit of such a product. The amount of PCIe lanes provided by TR is still plenty even for server use. The only benefits of TR over Epyc are the prices (and even then, Epyc is relatively cheap) and overclocking. Getting a 16-core to a sustained 4GHz on a high-end liquid cooling system is already a feat in of itself. Do people really think you're going to get any decent OC results on a 32-core system? Let's not forget the practicality of such a product, either. There is a need for a 32-core Epyc, but I'm finding there are very few people who have practical uses for even 16-core TRs.
Remember, Intel planned released the 7980XE at last minute (relatively). The only reason it exists was so Intel would have a product that will outperform AMD in this class of hardware. AMD doesn't need to make a product to out-do it.
EDIT
Reminds me of the Cold War, were the US and Russia kept making more nukes, just to one-up each other, only to realize either one of them had enough nukes to blow up the whole planet. At some point, people need to realize that more cores isn't going to make your everyday tasks run better. And even if games do end up using 8+ threads, I assure you, the game was not designed with your $1000+ CPU in mind.
Emille
You can get a 16 core threadripper 1950x for $100 less than a 10 core skylake x...you wouldn't have to have some serious self loathing to even consider the higher core skylake x cpus considering their clock speed is so diminished compared to amds lower at the bottom but consitent to the top type of deal.
D3M1G0D
BigMaMaInHouse