Cinebench R20 results show that the Core i9-12900K beats the Ryzen 9 5950X
Click here to post a comment for Cinebench R20 results show that the Core i9-12900K beats the Ryzen 9 5950X on our message forum
Kaarme
It's starting to look like Guru3D may need to move back to Intel in graphics card reviews, to better avoid CPU bottlenecks. Unless the 3D cache gives Zen3+ a tremendous boost, while the clocks stay at least the same.
However, obviously nothing is certain before Guru3D has run its own tests on Alder Lake.
nizzen
Can't wait to see the single core performance, when ddr 5 is "max" tweaked with Asus Apex z690 😀
SirkoZ
What?! 257W? That's ludicrous! Ricer probably does it at 125W.
Looks like 12th Core gen is the same piece of excrement as previous generations of intel 14nm hotcakes(TM). 😱
Netherwind
The price of the CPU will be the crucial factor here. Great if it's faster but not if the CPU costs 300€ more than the competition, not to mention the added cost of the mobo. DDR5 is probably something very few will buy as I guess it will cost vastly more than DDR4.
nizzen
257w is nothing 🙂
My 5950x and 3090 is drawing 820w together in Battlefield 😀
MonsterMX99
Show me gaming tests, nobody cares about cinebench.
Horus-Anhur
108 Celsius and 257W of power consumption for the CPU is very high.
Good thing for Intel that winter is coming.
nizzen
He used a cooler without monting bracket. You maybe know, there is non on the market right now 😉 It's coming soon.
Martin Christiansen
This is exactly why I bought a 5600X and a RX 6800 instead of going full retard. Electricity in my country cost 3 times as much as in the U.S.
Öhr
Holy Shit what is that power consumption?
I hope we can get a power adjusted benchmark soon, like who is more efficient/faster at identical power consumption.
On another note, matching corecount benchmarks may become obsolete with those two different core types in intels new chips...
Martin Christiansen
P.s. I forgot to add a smiley to indicate I was making a joke regarding the retard bit. It is in relations to current pricing and being a super enthusiast. Sorry in advance.
gx-x
I love how AMD fansboys jump at power consumption, not knowing AMD's power consumption at the top end of the line...
gx-x
https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-ryzen-9-5900x-and-5950x-review,7.html
...
Martin Christiansen
Who does this? I'm not seeing this anywhere in the thread.
Horus-Anhur
Why must there always be someone insulting others, calling people fanboys, simply because they have a different opinion.
You do realize that you are on a FORUM. A place for public and open discussion and voicing of ideas.
If you disagree with one idea, you just state the reason for that, and make your case.
You don't go about calling names on other people.
Embra
Usually it's one fanboy calling another fanboy a fanboy. Go figure. ^^
Kaarme
He should have made his own. Dude's probably some red bull drinker who has never held an angle grinder in his hands.
gx-x
I don't know man, why must there always be someone acting like 250W is something never seen before? Acting like AMD 5900X and 5950X don't use said 250W as well, with fully supported mobo and cooling. Why this, why that...
edit: yes I do realize I am on the forum, yet, anti-Intel is ok, defending (tho, I am not doing that for Intel's sake) Intel is "respect other peoples opinion" by default...Two of you went on to attack me right away. Hypocrites.
Horus-Anhur
This is the part that you should do. Pointing out arguments that counterpoint someone else statement.
This is what you should not do. Continuing to insult other people.
gx-x
Wow.
