#5677190

jbscotchman

2019-06-06 10:37

Well I'll be damned.

#5677192

bemaniac

2019-06-06 10:57

Oh hell yeah!

#5677245

slimmy427

2019-06-06 13:24

And now like most...upon release we will look at pictures on the internet and choose performance over glitter.

#5677350

Aura89

2019-06-06 16:54

slimmy427:

And now like most...upon release we will look at pictures on the internet and choose performance over glitter.

Performance over realism* and call it glitter, like nubs*

#5677352

Undying

2019-06-06 16:58

CoD is not dead yet.

#5677384

slimmy427

2019-06-06 18:51

Aura89:

Performance over realism* and call it glitter, like nubs*

At a 40-50% loss in performance for RTX ray-tracing, I will personally take the advantage of more FPS in an FPS. In its current form..."realism" does not play well with competitive. RTX belongs in VR right now but, I get that it need to be broadly excepted for more dev to invest time for implementation.

#5677492

Aura89

2019-06-06 22:22

slimmy427:

At a 40-50% loss in performance for RTX ray-tracing, I will personally take the advantage of more FPS in an FPS. In its current form..."realism" does not play well with competitive. RTX belongs in VR right now but, I get that it need to be broadly excepted for more dev to invest time for implementation.

Hence my post being exactly what you stated without calling it "glitter" Competitive fps players generally lower their quality settings and resolution, so obviously people who are trying to be "the best" will not be interested on ray tracing until its the only way a game works. Kinda ironic though, if i were a competitive player i would likely want ray tracing as there are effects and reflections that'll show where people are that otherwise wouldn't be there.

#5677496

Brasky

2019-06-06 22:26

Undying:

CoD is not dead yet.

I havn't played the last two because the future stuff isn't interesting, glad they are going back to the old standard.

#5677497

lucidus

2019-06-06 22:27

At least the campaign can look prettier.