Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark review
Click here to post a comment for Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark review on our message forum
Undying
Thanks for another game benchmark, HH. Next stop Dishonored 2 😉
Overall decent performance from both sides. I wonder how MW remaster compare to this IW.
EdInk
Thanks HH for this swift benchmark.
Most impressive card for me in this line up at 1080p would be the RX470. What a performance!
xIcarus
What's up with the 970 results? Nvidia shafting us already?
realmadrid
the gimping is so real
saucerer
What motherboard did you use for AMD FX-8370 tests?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
The MSI 970 Gaming.
mattm4
That RX480 is kicking @$$ and taking names!!
But on a side note... I feel its really time for COD to make a new engine, and revamp the whole game, instead of a few new features and a little polish on the graphics. I would consider buying one of their games then. But I guess..... if they keep getting good sales at a priemium price, why revamp it? lol
Undying
Yeah, very nice performance from RX480. Outperforming 980 and 390X and even a Fury Pro.
DeskStar
I hate to say it, but man am I sad to see the fury X with its 4gb of ram reduced to a low end card after all of that HBM is used up. 4gb was seriously a waste of time and effort on AMD's part.
CronoGraal
they shafted you when they sold you a 3.5gb card :P
Loophole35
Probably has something to do with the memory configuration. Nvidia may optimize it in a later driver (or not).
After looking closer may not be any issue. It's just a tad faster than the 780ti and about 20% slower than the 980. Seems about where it should be. This title is on a older engine that Kepler still has some optimization for so it may be you guys are seeing that.
Undying
Low end card? Fury X is a third best performing card this review. You really have no idea what your talking about.
They real sad part is that you cannot use your 4xTitan cards in any game.
mattm4
Deskstar, either you're one of those fanboys or a troll out against AMD. Most of your posts I've seen have been attacks on AMD for dumb reasons. Some of which come across that you really don't know what you're talking about half the time.
But... I cant take anyone seriously when they have 4x Titans, and run a 120hz monitor.. cause that's plain stupid lol.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Guys, how about not fighting and insulting for a change?, it would make a heck of a paradox towards the game right 🙂
Singleton99
Are you looking at different benchmarks to everyone else @ 1440p the fury-x is 2fps behind a 980ti which is pretty much equal , i class this as a excellent show for AMD and just confirms how well a 4gb card is still performing in the latest games today 🙂:):):):)
Turanis
Errmm...HBM is not GDDR5/X!
HBM releases textures & stuff from memory with more Speed than Gddr5/x.
So better get informed than spread non-sense.
When you get Gtx with HBM then you can talk real,until then stay low.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MGLQWlXo0Q&feature=youtu.be&t=2m48s
kinggavin
read the article my thoughts are considering this runs on a ps4 which is older hardware hd7870 and looking at the graphics quality which is not great its shocking that the orginial titan £1000 card on release which has pretty beefy specs to this day and a nice 6gb of vram is way down the bottom with a 1050 ti
Koniakki
I would say more close to a GTX 970 and it's called progress. :P
PrMinisterGR
How is the 380x the same as a 970. WTF happened.
-Tj-
Does the game have artificial 125fps cap?
