Billions of devices impacted by new Bluetooth Flaws
Click here to post a comment for Billions of devices impacted by new Bluetooth Flaws on our message forum

Evildead666
Bluetooth has never really been that secure.
It should be switched off when not being used, as should Wifi.
It saves the battery too.
Wired headphones are fine, and bluetooth speakers seem to be overused in public transport, by assholes listening to rap music.

Tree Dude

Denial

Fyew-jit-tiv

GroinShooter
Maybe it's not about rap but more about said people blasting music they like through a speaker forcing everyone around them to listen to it whether they like it or not. A bit asshole-ish one might say. Tbh I don't get this trend either - travelling in public transport and blasting your music out loud or people running and carrying a speaker in their hand instead of using headphones, just, why?

fry178
@Tree Dude
lol. no they are not.
the only time i got a usb stick infected, was when i copied files to an apple on display (5 apples total),
yet none of the other 15 windows computer (vista/7) transfered anything to the stick,
even that they were used a lot more for "testing/surfing" than the apples.
having less total amount of possible infections than other OSes doesnt mean its safer.
besides that, google how many flaws are/were known to apple os/ios, and not fixed for month/years even after being contacted by "finder" about it.
so sure, less overall chance/risc to get infected, but most apple users dont even care to run av/malware protection (cause those devices are so safe..),
so "one flaw" is enough to do damage...

Tree Dude

Denial

Yxskaft
I started using an AV on my smartphone and tablet when support stopped, shortly after Android 6 was made available.

__hollywood|meo
someone was telling me about this very experiment today. if i want to access my phone through another device, ill hardwire it, thanks. the internet of things is a pointless fad, much like VR. until theres something...anything...concrete to gain, im opting out. thats the issue at hand here - theres no functionality that i benefit from thats worth the security risk of constantly broadcasting my device.
i say that fully understanding that many other people ignore risks due to rationalizations of probability (bad things happen but they wont happen to me), or simply disregard them instead due to rationalization of importance/relevance (nothing to hide, nothing to fear fallacy)
no, they havent. nobody bothers writing viruses for apple products because they control a sliver of the desktop market (dont mention servers). inb4 iphones are everywhere...up until very recently, penetrating smartphones didnt get hackers much sensitive information besides the odd credit card.
their adherence to updating their devices software is based upon their ideological want/need to have every device operating under one condition or environment - not to have a more secure OS, but to easily control stability/functionality problems that arise through a new patch. pls note im not defending android devices topping out at particular iterations; thats a very legit complaint, & shy of hardware incompatibility, it frankly shouldnt happen at all.

Evildead666

Tree Dude

pimpineasy
Lol i been talkin about this stuff since cupcake on developer forums even look at my threads here
https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/nexus5x-connection-problems.410492/#post-5369297
https://forums.guru3d.com/threads/android-tweak-thread.410547/#post-5369335
maybe people dont care until they on youporn lol tryin to sell their sex tape

-Tj-

__hollywood|meo
yeah, tj.
i took that into account making my statement.
that is laudable. i did also say that the curiously inconsistent OS version support for android hardware is a valid & major issue. cloud encryption doesnt refute my assertion. if you ask me, the cloud shouldnt exist in the first place. its very presence is a security risk vs local storage regardless of encryption methods.
again, consolidated iOS version is done because they dont want to write two or three patches, updates, wrappers, watever, for the same applet/OS codebase in order for the hardware to work the way they want it to. thats the only leg up they might have that i see, personally, & thats not much. ive done a few security audits/pentests on wired, wireless, mobile, even airgap...that being said, i havent tested iOS11 yet.
i talked to a security chief (friend of a friend i just met) who was bragging about his fortune200 company using apple products today who insisted the company issued mobile phones were basically impenetrable. the guy always has bluetooth enabled. guess wat? so do his employees & associates. that was a tough conversation until the talk got technical & he stopped arguing...you dont have to root your mobile for the device to be compromised...

Evildead666