60Hz.... [youtube=gvdf5n-zI14]

So are companies using HDR to mean 10 bit panels instead of actual HDR which requires extra nits? 300 seems a low value for brightness.

" 300 cd/m² brightnes" For HDR does it not need to be WAY higher or did I just not READ it all lol Same kind of question Ruiner13 asked

2018.04.07 can we get clarification/explanation why +30" displays are not 120 and 240Hz refresh rates... except those produced in South Korea? btw ? us$500, 800, or 1200 retail ? weight ? display port 1.4 was published two years ago... 32.4 vs 48 Gb/s (in hdmi 2.1 [2017.01.04 for 8k res @ 50Hz) , dp 1.2 is nine years old (09.12.22) and is only 17 Gb/s, dp1.3 (14.09.15) HBR3 mode was 32 Gb/s enough for 4k uhd @ 120 Hz.

MaxBlade:

" 300 cd/m² brightnes" For HDR does it not need to be WAY higher or did I just not READ it all lol Same kind of question Ruiner13 asked

Big TV's do have higher nits but then you are also several meters further away. I'm not sure if it's viable with a monitor to have such strong brightness so close to your face.

RavenMaster:

60Hz.... [youtube=gvdf5n-zI14]

Guess you have to buy the $2500 screen then. If you have hardware to push those frames 😛

lucker1337:

Big TV's do have higher nits but then you are also several meters further away. I'm not sure if it's viable with a monitor to have such strong brightness so close to your face. Guess you have to buy the $2500 screen then. If you have hardware to push those frames 😛

When the 20XX cards get a 7nm refresh i will buy 2 of the best and SLI them. But for now i will carry on using my single RTX 2080. As for the $2500 Asus PG27UQ... f*** that noise (meaning the high pitched active cooling fan in the back of it). I'll wait until we get a 4k HDR 144hz monitor for 1500 or cheaper. It'll happen eventually. Just gotta play the waiting game.