BenQ EW2775ZH VA Full HD monitor
Click here to post a comment for BenQ EW2775ZH VA Full HD monitor on our message forum
hapkiman
A 1920 x 1080 monitor @ 60Hz?
Hey BenQ, 2010 called and wants their monitor back.
:sleep2:
signex
Pretty sure it can OC easily to 75hz or higher, i got mine at 79hz@BenQ GW2760HE
It has an amazing response time too, in my experience when you OC a monitor you can notice input lag sometimes but not the issue for me.
Irenicus
UltraWifiDvdCD
SHOCKTRUPPEN
SHOCKTRUPPEN
xcellent point!
Here here!!! Also throw in Freesync, G-sync, the kitchen sink and it really gets off putting for monitor buyers.
RavenMaster
rm082e
I had a BenQ FHD 27" VA a couple of years ago and moved to one of their 27" QHD IPS panels as an upgrade. I gave the VA monitor to my wife for her PC.
While the higher resolution is certainly worth it overall, I was really disappointed by the black levels on the IPS. Walking around in the crypts in Dark Souls 2 was a lot harder to see what was going on. It's like a mini rainbow in my face and I felt like I had to squint to cut through it.
My hope is that I can find a 32" 4K VA panel in a few years when it's time to upgrade again. I would take a 60hz VA panel over a 144hz IPS any day of the week.
tsunami231
Stormyandcold
UltraWifiDvdCD you seem to live in cuckoo land tbh.
Raider0001
I just bought 1080p 75Hz Freesync 27" 1ms TN, and now i will never go back to 60Hz no variable sync rubbish. The advantage of it is so awesome, freesync range gives u ability to literally increase details in games with no drop in smoothness, from now on I can just enable AA for free, does not matter if frame rate drops -10FPS if it is still in the range of the monitor. There are multiple other factors that makes it awesome too but the topic is about AMVA+ with combination of 1080p - is that any kind of a PRO ? Who needs super ultra color accuracy with low resolution ? It surely is not for gamers...
every single one of the LCDs I have ever had never OCed at all, all of them drooped frames badly after +1,+2 Hz more
sverek
PrMinisterGR
Raider0001
TNs are still good enough for gamers, I really do not care that the colors on the sides (when 1 color background is used) switch a bit, u cant see that in games, mine is using 8bpc, its bright, its saturated (well i boosted saturation 10 years ago) its fast and silky smooth and did not cost me my liver. I did have IPSs and VAs and TNs (TNs that were stolen from a TV - horrible) but this one ? iiyama g-master is very good indeed I love it and I consider this upgrade a better one than replacing any single graphic card from the last 10 years I have been replacing (ok maybe not 10 years exactly, it was Elsa Erazor X that got my attention so much).
Fox2232
JonasBeckman
I certainly like having gone from 1920x1200 to 2560x1440 and 16:9 isn't too much of a change from 16:10 though as a bonus now avoid that annoying black-bar stuff most games tend to do aspect correction via for 16:10 and others though on the other hand there's a pretty noticeable performance impact especially in newer games and VRAM usage went up by a fair bit too.
Going to 120hz would be nice but there's no way I'm going to be able to run any relatively modern game at 120 FPS without dropping down a ton of other settings so for now 60 Hz is OK even if higher is better. 😀
(Hitting 60 FPS is difficult as is though, even 30 can be a problem in the newest games unless you drop a number of graphical settings before dropping the actual display resolution.)
SLI and Crossfire certainly have a market but it'd be awesome if they weren't so bound by GPU driver profiles and "hacks" for full scaling and then there's display artifacts and other problems though hopefully this will improve over time.
Well the tech has only been around for a bit over 10 years now so heh well early-multi GPU was a bit of a interesting implementation too I guess compared to now what with multiple cables and slave/master GPU configs so there's been some improvements but D3D12 and Vulkan doesn't seem to have limited the need for display driver dependent profiles and other GPU tweaks and there's only a handful of games using D3D12 and even fewer using Vulkan as of now but that too might improve with time. 😀
Heard VA panels have some really nice black levels and colors though it's not a full replacement for current IPS and it's different versions nor has OLED and what else fully replaced the existing LCD lighting or how it's called and aside form price there's other drawbacks too but I guess time will once again slowly see this improve.
2560x1440 and above at more than 60 FPS will always be a problem though, I don't see that changing let alone the prices of GPU's needed for these resolutions while maintaining a somewhat playable performance though the 1080 is a pretty nice little powerhouse so there's at least a chance.
(Far as performance is concerned at least, less so with pricing I suspect so it'll be interesting to see what Nvidia announces for that 1080Ti GPU and then AMD with their 500 VEGA or whatever it'll be named, AMD Furious? :P Eh I guess Fury 2 or Fury Pro does work too.)
EDIT: Oh and yeah native 10-bit+ display panels too for HDR and what not, technically I guess 12-bit or even 16 is recommended for that effect and 10-bit native panels are expensive as is already.
(This current one I'm using is a 8+2 or FRC dithering or how it was called, not really comparable to the real deal though the previous one was a 6+2 so that's a improvement at least.)