Battlefield V PC System Requirements

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Battlefield V PC System Requirements on our message forum
#5550922
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
This could mean two things: Either EA has drastically improved their techniques and can squeeze more out of the same computing power. Or, and this is what i presume: EA has polished the engine a little bit and didn;t spend too much on upgrading. This would mean that gameplay will be very similar to BF1 i suppose.
#5550923
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
FX-6350 and i5-6600k are equal, lol, who writes those?
#5550926
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270288.jpg
purk_7:

This could mean two things: Either EA has drastically improved their techniques and can squeeze more out of the same computing power. Or, and this is what i presume: EA has polished the engine a little bit and didn;t spend too much on upgrading. This would mean that gameplay will be very similar to BF1 i suppose.
Why would they spend money when they could just roll out the same engine and just slap a coat of paint on it
#5550947
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/225/225084.jpg
Same specs as BF1. Which where slightly higher than needed because my sons PC has a 6300 FX and a 970 on a 75hz 24" 1080p monitor with V-sync on and does get 75 fps mostly.
#5550951
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243702.jpg
Can't they write? "512 KBPS" So, is it kBps, kbps, KiBps, ... ?
#5550953
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
FrostNixon:

FX-6350 and i5-6600k are equal, lol, who writes those?
Someone's voluptuous secretary.
#5550965
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
It is a console port, so they are still limited by the older versions of Xbox One and PS4. And while the latest versions have more powerful gpu chips, their cpus are still crap so no surprise here.
#5550974
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236670.jpg
Battlefield Battlefield 2 Battlefield 3 Battlefield 4 Battlefield 1 Battlefield 5 why they count like that?...:D
#5550975
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115710.jpg
airbud7:

Battlefield Battlefield 2 Battlefield 3 Battlefield 4 Battlefield 1 Battlefield 5 why they count like that?...:D
Swedes.
#5550979
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
airbud7:

Battlefield Battlefield 2 Battlefield 3 Battlefield 4 Battlefield 1 Battlefield 5 why they count like that?...:D
They earned too much money, that made them go mental 😀 Sys requirements, not really a thing to go after. Basically it always was similar to what the previous battlefield game required... which means we're getting the same engine of course. The few lines of more code they added probably don't tax the hardware too much. I'm still wondering what the server tick rate will be...
#5550982
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
I'm more interested in knowing wether or not it will have sli support - every previous battlefield has had, but as did every assassins creed game have, until origins came.
#5550999
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
Now its 5 ,,,, then what a 6 and 7 with the same darn graphics since BF3. thx
#5551019
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236670.jpg
DAW40:

Now its 5 ,,,, then what a 6 and 7 with the same darn graphics since BF3. thx
nope!...it goes 7...8...then 6.
#5551023
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/227/227994.jpg
This is basically Battlefield 9. 1) Battlefield 1942 2) Battlefield Vietnam 3) Battlefield 2 4) Battlefield 2142 5) Battlefield 3 6) Battlefield 4 7) Battlefield Hardline 8) Battlefield 1 The ones i left out arn't really part of the original PC Series which started it off.
#5551031
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
purk_7:

This could mean two things: Either EA has drastically improved their techniques and can squeeze more out of the same computing power. Or, and this is what I presume: EA has polished the engine a little bit and didn't spend too much on upgrading. This would mean that gameplay will be very similar to BF1 I suppose.
OR... And just hear me out on this... It's a reskin of the same game. I don't want to assume too much because EA is a passion driven company that delivers on the 'Game As A Service' model and cares about its games as much as its bottom line. durrr.
#5551032
data/avatar/default/avatar28.webp
2
TheDeeGee:

This is basically Battlefield 9. 1) Battlefield 1942 2) Battlefield Vietnam 3) Battlefield 2 4) Battlefield 2142 5) Battlefield 3 6) Battlefield 4 7) Battlefield Hardline 8) Battlefield 1 The ones i left out arn't really part of the original PC Series which started it off.
Their naming scheme truely is stupid.
#5551036
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
Reddoguk:

Same specs as BF1. Which where slightly higher than needed because my sons PC has a 6300 FX and a 970 on a 75hz 24" 1080p monitor with V-sync on and does get 75 fps mostly.
The best thing developers could do is to forget spending any time on wasting time on SLI and CF optimization in order to get better games.
#5551037
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242395.jpg
SaLaDiN666:

It is a console port, so they are still limited by the older versions of Xbox One and PS4. And while the latest versions have more powerful gpu chips, their cpus are still crap so no surprise here.
How do you mean? You aren't trying to tell us that BF games are developed on consoles and THEN ported to PC, are you? I hope not.
#5551046
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/201/201426.jpg
FrostNixon:

FX-6350 and i5-6600k are equal, lol, who writes those?
I bet you BF5 will rape 4 thread cpus regardless of IPC and clocks. My 1500x did better @ 3.5 with 8 threads, then 4.1 with 4 threads. 75% avg usuage in BF1 vs 100% usuage and game was not as smooth with 4 threads. Ofcourse, the 6600k is still a far better CPU.
#5551058
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232349.jpg
Dragam1337:

I'm more interested in knowing wether or not it will have sli support - every previous battlefield has had, but as did every assassins creed game have, until origins came.
Thats what i want to know....

Next Page