Battlefield: Hardline needs R9 290 or GTX 760 for best quality
Click here to post a comment for Battlefield: Hardline needs R9 290 or GTX 760 for best quality on our message forum
undeadpolice
Makes no sense since R9 290 = GTX 780.
Likely this game is optimized for nvidia
russ1
3gb Graphic Memory. Thats the GTX 960 outdated already.
Twiddles
Even with optimazation there is no way in heck it's going to be equal. Chech out the GTX 970 review and compare 😉 38 fps vs 55 fps in Battlefield 4 😉
(.)(.)
I fail see how this could even require such specs. Looks exactly like BF4 which looks like BF3 with slightly more AO.
Eh, I dont play these games anyway, but something for those who do to consider before pre-ordering or buying day 1. Wait for performance reviews.
Are you going to do a benchmark/performance review of BF:H, Hilbert?
undeadpolice
We are talking about GTX 760, not 970.
Please don't bring toxic fanboyism here.
And while looking at the review on ASUS GeForce GTX 760 Striker Platinum,
it lose out to reference R9 290 in BF4
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/asus_geforce_gtx_760_striker_platinum_review,15.html
(.)(.)
Hilbert, The servers are doing the weird thing again. Your post is now in second place, with Twiddles in first.
pbvider
I dunno if the game is optimized for nV HW but I saw in almost all youtubers video :"Recorded with nV Shadowplay! "
Also R9 290=GTX 760 ?!lel,since when?
Fyew-jit-tiv
60GB without DLC WOW!
Here are some stats for those who want to calculate how long this game will take to download.
http://i962.photobucket.com/albums/ae103/fyew-jit-tiv/Capture_zpsa749640c.jpg
pbvider
60 GB is with all the DLC,the same was for BF4 at launch.
rl66
of course they are not the same...
BUT... it's on windows...
dependly how it is coded (beween bad and average since BF3 lol) GTX 760 can have same or better result than a R9 290 due to the poor driver on the red side...
Hopefully for AMD user there will be update when the game will be release.
Don't worry, generaly on an unknow/beta/alpha or Open CL / GL stuff AMD perform very bad compared to NVidia, but it's just due to driver...
zer0_c0ol
well the game does have mantle
http://hexus.net/tech/news/software/71525-amd-three-blockbuster-games-titles-mantle-support/
Twiddles
You read it wrong. That review has all the recent cards in it including recent drivers. And if we´re talking about fanboyism, that´s their problem, I´ve used most of these cards and I´m not favoring any of these companies.
Mineria
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/galax_geforce_gtx_970_exoc_review,15.html
GTX 970 62fps (reference)
GTX 970 66fps (galax)
R9 290X 68fps
6fps in difference, big win there bro.
Besides that, Origin and that horrible battle log site, no thanks, they can go f themselves.
Twiddles
I meant check it out in the 970 review. Meaning: Compare the 760 in that review with the 290.
Ven0m
I played previous beta and it was a disaster. The game felt like plastic. I can't imagine this game having any multiplayer community 3 months after launch.
Even putting ideological aspects aside, I don't know how they want to make people buy & play this game.
fantaskarsef
I just have to laugh at this... first it's called Battlefield, then they put the 290 next to a 760... 😀
Corbus
Dunno why you guys are arguing about this, its not the first game to have weird requirements and it won't be the last .
Anyone in their right mind that has even basic hardware knowledge won't assume a 760 beats a 290 because of this.
Its clearly a driver/optimisation thing or dare i say,even marketing involved. Although i was under the impression that battlefield is an amd title.
Undying
Another crappy system req. 290 will destroy 760 any game. Difference is over 50% so i call this BS.
rpsgc
NVIDIA, the way it's meant to be p(l)ayedâ„¢ [paid]
f4nm4n
Don't you know ? AMD needs to clear stock of 2xx series.
So although the comparison is not correct, it fits the purpose.
