#5976920

cucaulay malkin

2021-12-28 09:15

why is no one making 24 and 29 inch 1440p displays compact size,crisp image and fairly easy to achieve a high framerate

#5976980

Agonist

2021-12-28 13:12

This would have been a bad ass monitor years ago.

#5977064

The Goose

2021-12-28 18:43

And it will have a silly price tag too.

#5977097

RavenMaster

2021-12-28 21:11

This monitor fails on so many levels. Displayport 1.2 (FAIL), HDMI 2.0 (FAIL), 2560x1080 (FAIL), No HDR (FAIL). 😕

#5977120

Venix

2021-12-29 00:41

RavenMaster:

This monitor fails on so many levels. Displayport 1.2 (FAIL), HDMI 2.0 (FAIL), 2560x1080 (FAIL), No HDR (FAIL). 😕

while i agree i will say the Displayport 1.2 (FAIL), HDMI 2.0 (FAIL) are not really fails because of the 3rd fail 2560x1080 (FAIL) 2560x1080 does not need faster interface . It will be a major fail if the price is over 400 euros 300-400 can be good for the money .

#5977122

Agonist

2021-12-29 00:56

RavenMaster:

This monitor fails on so many levels. Displayport 1.2 (FAIL), HDMI 2.0 (FAIL), 2560x1080 (FAIL), No HDR (FAIL). 😕

Explain how the 2560x1080 is a fail on a 29 inch 21:9? Cause no way in damn hell is anyone pushing over 144fps in most modern titles in 3440x1440 219.

#5977149

drac

2021-12-29 04:41

Agonist:

Explain how the 2560x1080 is a fail on a 29 inch 21:9?

The 29 inch part is the fail, 34 inches at 21:9 is barely large enough for that aspect ratio, let alone 29 inches. I’ve owned both 34 and 38 inch in 21:9 and 38 inch is a much better experience. Why make a 29 inch ultra-wide I have no idea, really weird.

#5977314

mtbiker033

2021-12-29 17:32

this would have been the monitor of the century 10 years ago LOL what in the world are they thinking

#5977316

TheDeeGee

2021-12-29 17:34

Let's hope the capacitors are soldered in correctly.

#5977425

Agonist

2021-12-30 00:13

drac:

The 29 inch part is the fail, 34 inches at 21:9 is barely large enough for that aspect ratio, let alone 29 inches. I’ve owned both 34 and 38 inch in 21:9 and 38 inch is a much better experience. Why make a 29 inch ultra-wide I have no idea, really weird.

38 inch isnt a 21:9 though. 3840x1600. 3440x1440 isnt really 21:9 either. As someone who has had single, and triple 25 inch 21:9, 29 inch 21:9, 35 inch 21:9, 29 inch eyefinity setup with 2x 23 inch side monitors, and 48 inch 32:9, I can easily tell you there is nothing wrong with a 29 inch ultrawide, let alone a 34. I can not but help to laugh at clowns like you that think the vertical space of a 38 matters more in gaming. I bet you were one of those OMG 16:10>16:9 for gaming. Claiming vertical space over FOV in widescreen.