ASUS Offers 280 Hz Capable 27-inch Full HD TUF Gaming Monitor (VG279QM)

Published by

Click here to post a comment for ASUS Offers 280 Hz Capable 27-inch Full HD TUF Gaming Monitor (VG279QM) on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/247/247876.jpg
"you'll need a PC, game and graphics card to run 280 FPS to maximize your experience" - easy: 320x240 in low settings
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Interesting monitor for the plebs. If I recall correctly there are few or near to none FHD+HDR monitors. That's kinda unique. Fast IPS (not unworthy TN), HDR enabled and low resolution to push higher frames. It will sell like hotcakes if priced properly.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/269/269625.jpg
gaming this, gaming that, nice to see product without the word game, Some companies must think were mugs, feel sorry for this generation and the parents that have Johnny screaming, ' I got have this one! ' 🙄
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270008.jpg
ladcrooks:

gaming this, gaming that, nice to see product without the word game, Some companies must think were mugs, feel sorry for this generation and the parents that have Johnny screaming, ' I got have this one! ' 🙄
The parent(s) just need to say Tuf. Pun intended.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/236/236974.jpg
I've already got my 60 Hz 4K monitor with very accurate sRGB colors, thank you. Call me back then there is a 50" 8K montor with accurate Rec.2020 colors and 240 Hz refresh rate. In fact, omit that refresh rate requirement entirely - just call me back when there is a 50" 8K monitor with accurate Rec.2020 colors and it doesn't run for $3000.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259804.jpg
My 27" Asus is 165 hz and that's plenty 😉
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
maddog55:

My 27" Asus is 165 hz and that's plenty 😉
Indeed. Unless this monitor does 3D so we get 140 hz per eye, this is an obvious waste of bandwidth.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/277/277212.jpg
1080 lines on a 27-inch monitor seems like very low pixel density to me. I don't think I would want this one.
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
Gomez Addams:

1080 lines on a 27-inch monitor seems like very low pixel density to me. I don't think I would want this one.
It should be quite fine if it provides good image quality, colors accuracy and truly achievable 280hz. Its PPI is exactly equal to the smallest OLED 4K models TVs on the market at the moment as they are 55inches and I never heard complaints there ever.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/208/208308.jpg
It should be quite fine if it provides good image quality, colors accuracy and truly achievable 280hz. Its PPI is exactly equal to the smallest OLED 4K models TVs on the market at the moment as they are 55inches and I never heard complaints there ever.
Wrong. You don't use a 55'' TV at the same distance as you use a 27'' monitor. 27'' should be 4k... 27'' and 1080p will look like crap, pixels everywhere.
data/avatar/default/avatar28.webp
If it does 280hz there are chances it does just that. Colors will likely be a secondary feature. I would be happy with a 144hz to set to 100 or 120 depending how much my ryzen 2000 can push.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232130.jpg
27inch for HD resolution is pixels stare down show.
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
ladcrooks:

gaming this, gaming that, nice to see product without the word game, Some companies must think were mugs, feel sorry for this generation and the parents that have Johnny screaming, ' I got have this one! ' 🙄
This generation. As if Barbies and the Apollo Space program, Beanie babies....every gen thinks it is the gen with all the issues.
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
I guess it's because 1080p @ 27" sucks that much that I have 5 of them.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196284.jpg
foxX:

I guess it's because 1080p @ 27" sucks that much that I have 5 of them.
I have one myself....and unless I'm actually trying to see the individual pixels, they're completely unnoticeable.....
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
@warlord for gaming only at +3ft? sure as a desktop screen used below that distance including office/surfing? nope. im 50 and dont have perfect eye sight anymore, and i can see pixels even start to see them below 2ft on my 32@1440p. anyone saying it is, please look up screen res for common phones/tablets, they usually are at least 720p for 6in (244 ppi).
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260855.jpg
I had a 27" 1080 monitor for a couple years and it was fine in motion. I only saw pixels when I was sitting idle and looking for them. If speed is your top priority, this is probably nicer than some of the other fast monitors out there. Most of them are the same size and res, but TN.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/208/208308.jpg
I guess it's because 1080p @ 27" sucks that much that I have 5 of them.
I have one myself....and unless I'm actually trying to see the individual pixels, they're completely unnoticeable.....
Probably neither of you have ever played on a proper 4k 27'' screen... The difference is HUGE. Even my 40'' 4k tv has a much better pixel density.
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
Nobody said picture is crystal clear. I had an 27" 1080p IPS in the past and it was godawful, but it doesn't mean it was unbearable. We are talking about 280hz here, not 75hz. For a gamer 1080p 240hz monitor rivals 4k 60hz if you can achieve those frames. Discussion in this thread turned misled.