Apple working on their own processors up-to 32 cores
Click here to post a comment for Apple working on their own processors up-to 32 cores on our message forum
Kaarme
If you have got the expertise and budget, I reckon it would be possible to make a far better architecture than the old x86-64, if you start from a clean table. Apple ought to have knowledge and it certainly has unlimited budget works. Furthermore, Apple makes its own OS, so it will automatically be 100% compatible with the CPU and take everything out of it. It will be expensive, no doubt, but it wouldn't be Apple if it wasn't expensive.
Denial
Silva
Don't know how they'll be faster, or if I believe claims without facts.
That said, more competition is better!
PS: But having poorly designed laptops that can't be serviced is bad, to the point I'd never consider touching them. For the price of a macbook I'd get 1 good laptop to use, and after 2 years I'd get a brand new better one!
isidore
Yeah in your own controlled environment with software coded by your laws, i bet it would be faster. Let me see Apple play at the multiplatform table and flex there...
barbacot
There is an Steve Jobs gremlin at Apple that from time to time gets out and yells: "We have to be a closed system! We have to build our own hardware".
The ambition of Steve Jobs to have apple laptops and computers as closed systems with only Apple hardware is the reason for PC popularity.
I find it strange that a free open minded visionary like Jobs wanted a closed system and failed at gaining popularity for Apple computers (one of the many reasons why he was fired from his own company) while IBM corporate men created an open system - PC...- not their intention but still...
Apple should learn from history and their mistakes - or maybe they are condemned to repeat these mistakes???
They can create their own CPU but is worth it???
If it's not at least 20 - 50% faster than what is now on the market then what's the point??? - and I strongly doubt that...
How to convince software companies to write programs for their new cpu's architecture when the global adoption rate of their systems is less than 10%??? - they will manage to alienate even the ones that write software for them now...
hijodeosiris
tsunami231
seeing intel swish cheese, cpu endlessly in new for security flaws these days, it make sense apple was only intel in some desktops cause it was faster then there stuff.
Can intel really claim to be fastest cpu these days? from what i see there price premium is no longer the price difference but that is me. I like apple closed environment for there OS to begin with less chance thing going wrong when people cant mess with core system. and less prone to virus and malware cause it closed off system.
schmidtbag
Fox2232
"You drunk, Apple?"
"No, I am Cider."
- - - -
Does anyone has name/codename for this CPU line?
suty455
crapple nuff said
asturur
moo100times
Impressive moves by Apple, definitely agree with that. However I wonder how Nvidia purchasing ARM could change this situation in the long run.
labidas
DannyD
Apple 32 core? So around £10,000 then and probably another £500 minimum for the Apple CPU cooler.
I haven't ever and never will buy Apple.
Valken
Competition is GOOD!
vbetts
Moderator
Really interested in seeing where Apple's ARM SOC's go, the M1 looks to be pretty freaking fast all things considering.
@labidas We're going to not post troll posts. This warning is also for everyone.
Silva
schmidtbag
Kevin Mauro
Even with the emulation on, so far they'd been very good. Can't get a 1:1 comparison; reviewers have been doing their best to compare the closest "rudimentary spec'd" & the results exceeded everyone's expectations.
@schmidtbag You just wrote an entire post complimenting Apple on their quality control?
Airbud
But can it run Crysis?