I can see the csgo boys getting this if the reponse time is good and there is no ghosting.

I can see the csgo boys getting this if the reponse time is good and there is no ghosting.

Something something Volvo giff 256 tick server

So they have the same product but instead with 144hz and it costs 220-250 euro, 96hz extra costs you over double the price, not a good deal to be honest.

I hope some of these High Hz start to trickle down to upcoming 4k panels soon ...

The decrease in motion blur isn't so great. At 240Hz there's still substantial blur, and not much of an improvement over 144Hz. What I'm waiting for is a 240Hz with adjustable strobing... And a day when we can use Gsync and strobing at the same time.

when i can get an asus 32in 75Hz with flicker free led and 10bit panel (12bit lockup) for 400$. no thank u...

when i can get an asus 32in 75Hz with flicker free led and 10bit panel (12bit lockup) for 400$. no thank u...

I do not understand why u ppl insist on Asus products, they do not produce LCD panels, they will not use their own controller (hence G-Sync), and the power supply will probably come from some Chinese markets for a dollar, whats left ? some software tweaks and leds and branding oh and a plastic. Being a young company at this part of their business it is probable that a mistake or 2 will be included, and U believe that somehow theirs is better ? pure magic

The jump from 144hz to 240hz isn't as huge as going from 60hz to 144hz so even as a huge time CSGO player, i'd pass on this.

This is a rip-off right now. Hugely overpriced. But they still sell, which is why they get away with it.

I do not understand why u ppl insist on Asus products, they do not produce LCD panels, they will not use their own controller (hence G-Sync), and the power supply will probably come from some Chinese markets for a dollar, whats left ? some software tweaks and leds and branding oh and a plastic. Being a young company at this part of their business it is probable that a mistake or 2 will be included, and U believe that somehow theirs is better ? pure magic

A plastic.....what...please tell us. Asus have been running longer than most companies and imo produce the best motherboards, ive never had an Asus mobo fail on me and ive had quite a few over the years, ive tried Msi,Gigabyte,Evga,Asrock and Ecs...none of them compared to any Asus boards ive used, regardless 25" is way to small for my liking....27" minimum...if i had to change my 40" Samsung tv screen.

@Raider0001 And when did i say they make panels? So why asus? Because: 1. It beats any other brand in every test ive seen, including the more expensive benq using same panel, and only loses to professional screens. 2. High refresh rates only help with latency but introduce tearing (unless gsync or freesync which dont work above 100hz) 3. I get a larger screen with higher ppi and better and accurate colors for less money.. 4. I can customize all buttons the way i want it, and even turn off the led, since i know if my monitor is on or not, without a light telling me. So if you can show me a moni from a different brand that does the above better and/or the same at a lower price, let me know.

when i can get an asus 32in 75Hz with flicker free led and 10bit panel (12bit lockup) for 400$. no thank u...

Different type of customer. People getting a 240Hz panel don't care that much about IQ, they care about latency.

The jump from 144hz to 240hz isn't as huge as going from 60hz to 144hz so even as a huge time CSGO player, i'd pass on this.

Have you used a 240hz screen? I would definitely be interested in this if my system was fast enough to use it but pushing 240hz is tough in most modern games.

I do not understand why u ppl insist on Asus products, they do not produce LCD panels, they will not use their own controller (hence G-Sync), and the power supply will probably come from some Chinese markets for a dollar, whats left ? some software tweaks and leds and branding oh and a plastic. Being a young company at this part of their business it is probable that a mistake or 2 will be included, and U believe that somehow theirs is better ? pure magic

Asus is not your random copy cat. Not all their products are perfect. But that's true for any company. Hell, I'm old. Here's a story from back in the day, showing that they have at least "some" engineering skills. It's an interesting story about Asus' early years: Back in the day Intel was developing the 486. It was not on the market yet, but technical documentation about the processor did exist. Based on that Asus created a motherboard prototype for the 486. To test their motherboard they required an engineering sample of the processor. So an Asus engineer along with their prototype went to Intel and asked for the processor. Intel was surprised when they saw the motherboard. They allowed it to be tested and to their surprise it worked flawlessly. The story is not over. Intel faced a problem with their own motherboard prototype and asked the Asus engineer to look at it. He found a fix for their problem. Since then Asus received engineering samples before any other manufacturer.

@Raider0001 And when did i say they make panels? So why asus? Because: 1. It beats any other brand in every test ive seen, including the more expensive benq using same panel, and only loses to professional screens. 2. High refresh rates only help with latency but introduce tearing (unless gsync or freesync which dont work above 100hz) 3. I get a larger screen with higher ppi and better and accurate colors for less money.. 4. I can customize all buttons the way i want it, and even turn off the led, since i know if my monitor is on or not, without a light telling me. So if you can show me a moni from a different brand that does the above better and/or the same at a lower price, let me know.

1. just do not believe ya or those tests, I cant imagine 2 identical panels while one is better than the other in any meaningful way, is Asus magically changing the way liquid crystals move with just software ? 2. there are other brands with high refresh 3. about pricing: AOC AG271QX: 27''/LED/TN/1440p/1ms/144Hz/FreeSync: 1959 PLN Asus MG278Q: 27''/LED/TN/1440p/1ms/144Hz/FreeSync: 2299 PLN 4. meaningless feature with those buttons and i can disable 1 led in a monitor menu too - could u believe in that ?

Asus is not your random copy cat. Not all their products are perfect. But that's true for any company. Hell, I'm old. Here's a story from back in the day, showing that they have at least "some" engineering skills. It's an interesting story about Asus' early years: Back in the day Intel was developing the 486. It was not on the market yet, but technical documentation about the processor did exist. Based on that Asus created a motherboard prototype for the 486. To test their motherboard they required an engineering sample of the processor. So an Asus engineer along with their prototype went to Intel and asked for the processor. Intel was surprised when they saw the motherboard. They allowed it to be tested and to their surprise it worked flawlessly. The story is not over. Intel faced a problem with their own motherboard prototype and asked the Asus engineer to look at it. He found a fix for their problem. Since then Asus received engineering samples before any other manufacturer.

I have a story for U - Asus motherboard with no cpu fan fail error Ignore option because i had a deluxe fan with a "deluxe board" - a Nexus 7 (by Asus) with hopeless wifi, SoC that could prepare my dinner, broken updating from google, 1 hang per week - 2 xonars one more expensive than the other - both with exactly same issues: 30% of chance that 1 channel or both were missing or driving pure noise Of course I also heard about rubbish Nexus 7 II LTE and many other Every single product i have ever had with asus brand was irritating or just crap

@ raider0001 So what? Without comparing total amount of sales with the total amount of returns/repairs for a cerain time frame, it doesn't say anything about a product/brands quality. I built about 40 desktops for myself/friends etc in the past 15y, all based on asus products, not one failed or needed repair. Besides that, Nasa/other space companies have rocket scientist building stuff that costs millions and gets blown to pieces at launch, and you expect consumer grade stuff to work flawlessly. Right... The fact that you dont believe one moni can be better than another, just because they are based on the same panel, is either ignorant or showing you dont know much about screens. Best example is sony. They don't make the panels for their tvs, but buy em from another company. They always get different results on reviews for their tvs vs the supplying brand. Why? Because they have a different chip and software that runs the screen. Same for most monitor makers. So if i see 2 monitors that are using the same panel, getting different results in reviews, is completely normal. And the fact that it was the same site, using the same equipment to test calibration etc, the results are "valid" for me... Another example, two completely different cars can have an identical engine (ferrari and maserati), yet handle/perform completely different.