AOC CQ32G1 Curved Monitor: 31.5 Inch, 144 Hz, FreeSync, Sub $400
Click here to post a comment for AOC CQ32G1 Curved Monitor: 31.5 Inch, 144 Hz, FreeSync, Sub $400 on our message forum
tunejunky
i feel so ripped off right now...have the 34" agon g-sync....
nice monitor...but i could've bought an rtx 2070 with the price difference
Venix
ok for the price looking like a dream ..... why i keep thinking where is the catch ? :P spec wise sounds awesome !
Robbo9999
https://www.techspot.com/article/1788-display-tech-compared/
Well, these are VA panels, which are great for contrast & colour, but they are slow in comparison to TN panels. I think I read a detailed professional review of a high refresh rate VA panel and they have more smearing/ghosting than high refresh rate TN panels, and I think the input lag is a bit higher too (not sure about that last point, vague recollection). So, I think that's why it says in the article that they're aimed at casual gamers rather than more competetive gamers. I think TN panels are still the best for least input lag and least ghosting (ie clear image while moving). I do wish my TN panel had better contrast, colours are pretty good on mine though at 100% sRGB. I also read a review recently about a really good TN panel that had fantastic contrast, while still being a 144Hz panel, so that would be the best of both worlds - they're quite rare though.
EDIT: just found this article that's related to our comments, haven't read it yet, reading it now:
slicer
If it will have 30-144Hz Freesync range like my current AOC Ago models, then it will sell. If not... there are better options.
Maddness
I really do wish there were a lot more Freesync IPS screens. The majority high hertz screens tend to be VA or TN. Although all screens have there draw backs, I still prefer IPS.
Robbo9999
https://www.techspot.com/article/1788-display-tech-compared/
IPS has greater input lag than TN too. That's probably one reason why TN and high refresh rate have been matched together more than any other type, but also due to cost to perhaps.
EDIT: just found this article that's related to our comments, haven't read it yet, reading it now:
zbaic
Venix
@Robbo9999 honestly i played on few ips monitors already and even more tn monitors i am not a competitive gamer ...for a decade now or so , i do not play cs:go etc ...so even 10ms diference on input lag i will not be able to tell ! my experience in VA was that it was ghosting on dark scenes and small brighter spots (( like stars on the space )) and i was able directly to tell since i was playing space minecraft (avorion) something i did not notice on either ips or tn panels
Maddness
Neo Cyrus
Is the colour reproduction on VAs no longer crap? The pseudo-HDR FreeSync 2 certified panels I see are VAs.
I haven't taken a good look at any modern VA in real life in an eternity, are the black levels really that noticeably better than IPSes?
Anyway, I'm waiting for some real non-BS HDR 144Hz+ monitor to be released at a reasonable price. It's probably 5+ years away.
metagamer
gerardfraser
https://www.amd.com/en/products/freesync-monitors
I just checked AMD ,they list 212 IPS free sync monitors.Great list and sortable.
Maddness
EasternUNO
Rx4speed
The input lag issue on TNvsIPSvsVA isn't really an issue. Most gamers have a reaction time of around 200ms. Adding on ping @ 50ms and other factors makes the TN@1ms vs IPS@4ms numerically irrelevant.
Robbo9999
Neo Cyrus
metagamer
Mainly displaying the song colour. Also contrast, brightness, gamma.
The Goose
Screen prices in general are bouncing all over the place atm, my Acer 27" 1440p which i bought second hand with a small issue for £110 died recently and now im using an 18" Samsung sync master until i can find a reasonably priced 27" 1440p or 24" 1ms(ideally 1440p), as much as i liked my Acer b276hul i cannot justify paying 3-400 pound for a small screen.