AMD unofficially confirms Radeon Flagship – R9 390X - Launches at Computex
Click here to post a comment for AMD unofficially confirms Radeon Flagship – R9 390X - Launches at Computex on our message forum
ricardonuno1980
@-Tj-: have you read my post #13? 🙂
-Tj-
Noisiv
LOL You are going sideways and not addressing anything I said
Why do you quote PR slides in architecture/GPU prediction discussion?
And how is GTX 680 or 780 useful in reaching conclusion about Titan X?
Especially when you have more closer match, and same arch. - GTX 980?
Is this really so hard to comprehend:
[spoiler]
Punch in Teraflops and you'll see that Titan X over 980 is same as 390X over 290X.
Meaning Titan X will keep the same advantage over 390X that 980 has over 290X. But count in some improvements on GCN and AMD should catch up [/spoiler]
KissSh0t
Will lower end cards feature HBM?
Anarion
KissSh0t
Ughh... that's a shame...
I really want to move on from my card, the built quality of this brand is just horrid. not sure what to go to next :T
Wait and see I guess.
I want to know what is going on with Mantle.. Is it dropped or not. That is pretty much going to affect my purchase decision.
warezme
Price is important
If AMD is serious about getting back it's share as they state, then pricing will have to significantly undercut Nvidia. Give users a serious bang for buck advantage and even I would consider switching from Nvidia products to AMD. I have generally stayed with Nvidia because in my experience their drivers are much better and support my 3 monitor vision surround setup with generally no problems. AMD can't hope to gain market if they price themselves into the Titan range.
-Tj-
Noisiv
bemaniac
I'm not upgrading again until I can't even run high settings.
-Tj-
Denial
ricardonuno1980
@Denial and @Noisiv are stupids and donkey... lool
@-Tj- worked very well about succession of GPU's! 🙂
Noisiv
This was my point:
__________________________________
GTX 980 = 4.6 Tflops
Titan X = (4.6 + 1/2*4.6) = 6.9 Tflops
290X = 5.6 Tflops
390X = 8.1 Tflops
__________________________________
Titan X / GTX 980 = 1.5
390X / 290X = 1.44
1.5 ~ 1.44
__________________________________
Meaning that Titan X gives similar improvement over GTX 980 (1.5), like 390X gives over 290X (1.44).
So Titan X will keep the same advantage over 390X that 980 has over 290X.
But then we have to include GCN improvements, and 390X should catch up with Titan X.
And this is the main unknown - GCN improvements per ALU.
There should be some, but we shouldn't expect Maxwell-like revolution. HBM is enough of revolution and where AMD likely spent most of the work
CybrSage
KissSh0t
Also.. are we sure about the Titan X specs? like.. are they really actually the specs shown..
*awkwardly laughs and sweats a little*
Sergio
"Our mission is done with consoles, now its time to milk pc community with Nvidia together"...
Perjantai
On white paper R9 390x destroys titan X except on mem+gpu speed. Ofc titan will use less power but 390x will be more for less money. And games with nvidia tech shall never be good on anything but green cards.. (not always with them eather Watch_dogs and AC unity anyone?)
snorge
-Tj-