AMD to release TressFX 2.0

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD to release TressFX 2.0 on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180832.jpg
Moderator
I hope they did something about the performance drops when enabled
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220385.jpg
Maybe they can now simulate beard hair. Viking game incoming?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/211/211619.jpg
Maybe they can now simulate beard hair. Viking game incoming?
Amon Amarth: The Video Game 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/116/116345.jpg
haha lol, that would be awesome 😀 rofl
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224067.jpg
I hope they did something about the performance drops when enabled
Yea, Tomb Raider was laggy as hell with just her hair using it
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/249/249168.jpg
Today is the 13th isn't it? I know it's in California but APU has already been going on for 2 days. I'm not complaining, I'm just excited because we should hopefully hear how well Mantle works today with some real world stats. I could so nearly play Tomb Raider with everything including TressFX on a 7850. Hopefully TressFX 2 means even better optimization. Given what's actually being done, I'm impressed it doesn't give more of a performance hit. It is friggen hair simulation after all. On another note, Bullet 3 is also being announced. Its a pretty great physics SDK and I am sad its not used more. Only games I know of are Trials 2 and the RAGE engine (by rockstar, not the game rage).
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/249/249885.jpg
Cool news. I never understood the complaints about performance hit with TressFX, I was able to run Tomb Raider on pretty much max settings (minus anti-aliasing maxed out) on a 7950, TressFX looked great and I had solid frame rates. Maybe just didn't work well for nVidia cards?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/189/189596.jpg
.......all depends...IF GAMING STUDIOS WILL ADOPT THESE FEATURES........ GAMEPLAY!!! Indeed..... make me think of Gabe Newell...(a**h**e)...concerning gameplay....
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/249/249957.jpg
I hope they did something about the performance drops when enabled
Rendering each strand of hair, what do you expect?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243536.jpg
Rendering each strand of hair, what do you expect?
Umm she had it in a pony tail lol, around 10 strands were loose haha but sure the more fur, nice grass and fancy hairstyles the better.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/227/227853.jpg
Cool news. I never understood the complaints about performance hit with TressFX, I was able to run Tomb Raider on pretty much max settings (minus anti-aliasing maxed out) on a 7950, TressFX looked great and I had solid frame rates. Maybe just didn't work well for nVidia cards?
I believe something like a 7950 could render it nicely at that level of quality, but I played the game on a gtx 560 and tressfx was a no-go. someone above said he ran it at almost max on a 7850, which i really doubt since it's a tad better than my card. and i doubt it's so heavily optimized towards amd cards. although nvidia had their share of problems with tomb raider, driver-wise. it would really be gay if nvidia/amd would start developing and heavily optimizing their own technology for their own cards. because in time it will be all about the features instead of raw performance or performance/price ratio like it is now.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/49/49579.jpg
Where is the BreastFX?
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
Where is the BreastFX?
This guy has his priorities straight.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
This guy has his priorities straight.
Or not, you want hairy breasts? xD I think a lot of people mix TressFx with a generic physics engine. TressFx is only for simulating hair like textures/sprites/geometry. Just like by nvidia, nv hair has a special branch for it and its not physx in general 😉 And imo TombRaider hair is not buggy, its only on nvidia - that hair twitching time to time (benchmark) is actually driver fault. I didnt have that before, it started with newer drivers since r320 or 325+
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/124/124168.jpg
Cool news. I never understood the complaints about performance hit with TressFX, I was able to run Tomb Raider on pretty much max settings (minus anti-aliasing maxed out) on a 7950, TressFX looked great and I had solid frame rates. Maybe just didn't work well for nVidia cards?
Have no problem with tress fx all max setting except for 2x ssaa.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242330.jpg
What about Boobs FX? Games would be interesting as never before ha ha
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224796.jpg
Where is the BreastFX?
Skyrim + Mods = What You Want Also, TressFX ran great for me... you just needed a high end AMD GPU or something close to it at the time... I think it may be better now with drivers for NVIDIA and mid range AMD GPUs, but I haven't checked it out in months myself.