AMD Ryzen Threadripper Launches around 10th of August
Click here to post a comment for AMD Ryzen Threadripper Launches around 10th of August on our message forum
zer0_c0ol
It makes sense
nz3777
That thing is (Huge) my Gorsh!
stereoman
My 4790k will do me for a while but as soon as they release a mobile version i'll be picking up a new laptop, for content creation these chips are the sh!t.
devicenull
That geekbench shot looks somewhat disappointing/wierd compared to those leaked Intel ones?
That score is basically equal to the score of a Ryzen 1600X?!!!!
Can't be right?
EDIT: it wasn't geekbench 3.4.1 used for the leaked intel stuff, 4.1.0 for this one...
EDIT: Seem like it's comparable to an i7-6900K.... still disappointing then, as the 6900K is only 8c/16t....? (https://browser.primatelabs.com/processor-benchmarks)
beta-sama
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3104123
And Threadripper is a 16core cpu ? LOL
devicenull
User uploaded bench, seems that 6800K is oc'd a bit?
But yeah... Pretty sad if that's true for Threadripper?
beta-sama
Its my cpu OC to 4.5Ghz.
devicenull
Ahh hehe 😉 well nice one, unless Skylake-X goes bananas, your system is good for another year or two 😉
Exascale
It looks as big as Knights Landing or Skylake-SP chips! More pins too. 4094 vs 3647 with Skylake-SP.
MrAMD
Not what she said. lol:banana:
Quicks
The way AMD hardware gets delayed I will not be surprised it get delayed to next year JULY 2018!!! hmm like we have been waiting for VEGA maybe we might just see that next year in stock as well.
JamesSneed
No way that geekbench is correct. If you go look at Ryzen 1700x running stock it is getting 21-24K or so on multithreaded.
Ryu5uzaku
Yup this would be getting less then 4ghz 1700-1800x
zer0_c0ol
I think you mean Intel and vega is not delayed
jortego128
Agree about the bad score. Stock 1700 scores better single threaded, about the same multi. Def a compromised result.
http://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/3104212
No way a 3.4GHz TR is going to have worse results, unless the program just cannot correctly use it.
FlyBy
The list below doesnt even feature that said CPU 1950X 16c/32t !
Modell
CPU-Kerne (Threads) Takt (Standard) Takt (Boost) XFR
TDP
Threadripper 1998X 16 (32) 3,5 GHz
3,9 GHz ja
155 W
Threadripper 1998 16 (32) 3,2 GHz 3,6 GHz -
155 W
Threadripper 1977X 14 (28) 3,5 GHz 4,0 GHz
ja 155 W
Threadripper 1977 14 (28) 3,3 GHz 3,7 GHz -
155 W
Threadripper 1976X 12 (24) 3,6 GHz 4,1 GHz ja 125 W
Threadripper 1956X 12 (24) 3,2 GHz 3,8 GHz ja 125 W
Threadripper 1956 12 (24) 3,0 GHz 3,7 GHz -
125 W
Threadripper 1955X 10 (20) 3,6 GHz 4,0 GHz ja 125 W
Threadripper 1955 10 (20) 3,1 GHz 3,7 GHz -
125 W
jortego128
I just ran GB 4.10 on my bone stock 1700 w/ 2666MHz RAM.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3106308
3909 Single Core and 21084 Multicore
Pretty much confirms the TR result is broken.
Loophole35
For ****s and grins here is my work PC. 4590 i5 with 8GB of 1600Mhz RAM.
4007ST and 11748MT.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3106507
Fox2232
Thing is that this screenshot is made from HTML view of "website". You get your result uploaded and everyone can see it.
Guess what, there is no result for TR uploaded on given time. Actually there are no TR results at all.
And no, user could not remove his result, because this result is anonymous. So, someone either downloaded random result page and changed it, or edited it directly in browser.
Either way it is fake. And geeks do not remove leaked benches, nor ES results.
airbud7
4790k/gtx980...ain't no joke!.....Nice setup Bro!
