AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Reaches 4.1 GHz With Liquid Cooling
Click here to post a comment for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Reaches 4.1 GHz With Liquid Cooling on our message forum
tsunami231
most intresting, pretty high voltage too
-Tj-
Not bad, I saw 8core 1900x TR with 4.2ghz boost, would this mean 4.3-4.4ghz oc? 🤓
jura11
This CB score looks awesome, this CPU will be rendering monster, can't wait on Corona benchmark and V-RAY bench as well
Hope this helps
Thanks, Jura
D3M1G0D
Wow, those are nice results. Just two more days until release... can't wait!
sverek
Who would know glueing CPUs together can be so efficient?
Can't wait for the review.
Elder III
Stop, results like this make me want one all the more... I'm going with a much more essential new septic system instead, but with things like this make me think an outhouse wouldn't be all that bad. lol
shamus21
impressive no wonder Intel are running around like headless chickens
Ryu5uzaku
Not that high in my opinion. It clocks to 4ghz on 1.25 tho. I can't get even near 4ghz with 1.25v.
It's something you can run daily that 1.408.
The Average
Considering this Tt lcs is not for high end systems, I expect TR to perform better with proper waterblock. I wish my OCLabs 06 waterblock could sit on this football field IHS...
Solfaur
Looking better and better, can't wait for the review!
IceVip
1.248 for 4.0 on 16 cores..
considering my 1700 wants 1.35 for 3.7 to be stable at LLC lvl 3
Noisiv
no wonder, because i think they already said they were harvesting parts for TR
JamesSneed
Running 4.0 GHz @ 1.25 I would expect you could keep that cool with air. The reviews are going to be fun to read.
schmidtbag
On 16 cores, maybe, but you might have some loud fan issues.
Personally, I'd much rather stick with the 1.25v and lose the extra 100MHz. I'm at 3.9GHz myself because the power savings were so much greater.
DARKSF
As for the V-RAY Benchmark there are already 2 entries with Threadripper 1950X and one with 1920X and from all results the second place is held by 2xEPYC 7601 system with total of 128 threads just behind the crown winner with 4xE7-8890 v3 with 144 threads.EPYC Threadripping 🙂 AMD will just beat Intel like a dog in the workstation class.
https://benchmark.chaosgroup.com/cpu?page=9
IceVip
I honestly believe intel didn't do more cores because it was already leading.
Now that EPYC is on its way once its up on the market and 128 threads at
a high frequency is available to the average consumer intel will react with
something nobody was expecting. Not a intel fanboy myself. But i just know
that you need competition to make things better otherwise you just milk and
get stuck in time, provide small upgrades and bumps so that the community
doesn't think you're stuck and can't make something new.
lmimmfn
I want one, cant wait for HH's review
Warrax
16 cores 32 threads @ 4ghz with only 1.25v ??? that's pretty damn good, better than most Ryzen! most of them reach 4ghz at 1.35v+
Amx85
:infinity:
No, 4.20GHz "Boost" is the "XFR", up to 200MHz over "Boost" just affects 1 Core per CCX while "Boost" affects the half of total threads or cores, then there´s no a moment where all cores runs @4.20GHz same time without OC :wanker:
Amx85
i think TR has new stepping (ARK improvements) :infinity:
