AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Single Core Cinebench 15 Score Leaks
Click here to post a comment for AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Single Core Cinebench 15 Score Leaks on our message forum
Undying
7700k was the fastest cpu only few years back and now its a ryzen 3 level of performance lol.
Kaarme
To be fair it was the last "top" mainstream CPU of the decade of disgrace and degeneration caused by no competition in the CPU market. Matching it is no achievement. It's like saying, in the 80's, that the cheapest American car would be better than the best Soviet car. No achievement whatsoever.
ChampSilva
If you remember 7700K is a 6700K with few mhz.
And 6700 is 2015 CPU.
Kaarme
Didn't the 7000 series also have the support for lolptane? It's what Intel was doing with the Core architecture before Ryzen: They just shrank the node occasionally, upped the clocks, and upgraded features like iGPU, DDR# support, sata/usb versions, etc. Otherwise, they didn't touch the cores themselves all that much, which is best demonstrated by how the security holes revealed of late often affects already CPUs from many generations ago.
ChampSilva
Do you think intel would kept 4-cores until today? Probably 6 or 8 cores.
Not sure about the 10c.
hijodeosiris
Abso-tota-lutely, you just need to look at his still resilient idea of pricing his top dogs with retarded exorbitant out of touch prices, we would probably would get a 6/6 K version and be 1000 USD and fangays would gone super wet for their "outstanding innovation and state-of-the-art" tech used, then they would drop something with HT and be other 50% extra price.
Fender178
I would say that if it weren't for AMD that it would have taken a lot longer to adopt more than 4 core processors for mainstream.
jbscotchman
Another nail in the coffin for Intel. Seriously they gotta get their shit together.
Kool64
What's more curious is the 10900X........
nizzen
*in Cinebench gaming 😉
Cinebench singlethread ≠ gaming performance
Exodite
How so?
You're not confusing it with the upcoming 10900K, right? The 10900X is the lowest end Cascade Lake HEDT chip and these aren't known to be speedy.
Kool64
No I'm talking about the X if you are to take into account it's 4.7 ghz boost that means it's either not boosting or the Ryzen chip is meeting the 4.7 boost clock for clock under single core.
nizzen
Overclocked and with 4000 tweaked memory -> sub 50ns memorylatency, it's faster than any Ryzen cpu in games. At stock clock and slow memory, it sux 🙂 It's insane difference between stock and "max" overclocked.
Yes it's slow in Cinebench game compared to 64core threadripper 😉
Ryrynz
Matching what was a top end gaming processor 3 years ago at this price point is the achievement.. This is entirely the reason why you have eight plus cores now in gaming rigs rather than six..
Screw ya head on mate.
Exodite
From the Cascade Lake reviews I've read/seen that seems par for the course. In Cinebench single thread they seem to lag the upper-tier Ryzen 3K chips by 5-10%. With the lower core clock of the 3300X, compared to the 3800X/3900/3950X that is, this is about what I'd expect.
I don't think it's speaking to the strength of the 3300X as much as how poorly positioned Cascade Lake was though. 🙁
alanm
Odd that you missed the other CPUs in the list ( i9-9960x and i9-10900x ) which had the same scores.
Kool64
I'll agree with that.
Astyanax
https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2020/04/AMD-Ryzen-3-3300X-vs-3100.jpg
JiveTurkey
Gaming is the only thing pushing my system.
Any title using a single threaded engine will be like ps2 Era. So even a 50$ cpu will blow way past anything from that era. But maybe this about those 955fps v 972fps competitions in Diablo II competitions?
Think the current sweet spot for only gaming is 8-12 cores. Going more cores will start to negatively affect the the price, top clockspeeds, and tdp. I would spend the money on a 24 core cpu if I though it would make a positive diff in gaming.
metagamer
Based on a made up chart. Talk about jumping to conclusions.
Let's use our brains, if possible. If that chart is true, the takeaway is this.
it's faster than the 2700x
it's slower than the 7700k
I don't see how Intel are losing here.
lol
