AMD Radeon VII 3DMark results Surface
Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon VII 3DMark results Surface on our message forum
mohiuddin
Did u get your's yet to play with it, sir?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
craycray
Reddoguk
These things will only improve with time.
I believe AMD improves GPUs over time much more than Nvidia does.
I honestly think this cards performance will increase over time. Not to 2080ti levels but to in between the 2080 an ti somewhere.
Aura89
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-nvidia-driver-updates-performance-tested,5707.html
Both companies improve their drivers, both companies beat out eachother in different scenarios, they are effectively equal in their improvements unless you're specifically looking at 1 game, and then it'll depend on which game it is to determine who is "better" at improving performance through drivers
In fact, on average, nvidia performance via driver updates is 4.3% improvement, vs AMDs 2.3% average, which would state that technically, nvidia is better, unlike your statement says. But realistically, it all depends on the game, and a 2.3% or 4.3% is not enough to worry about in the first place. The places that either companies get the biggest improvements from are games where a specific companies card didn't work well in due to a bug or bugs from the beginning, such as rise of the tomb raider for AMD, which saw a pretty big improvement over initial drivers, but this is kinda a double edge sword, as yes, it saw big improvements, but it only saw big improvements due to the fact that there was a bug causing lower then expected performance on the initial driver....this is less "optimization" and more "we had issues in the beginning, now we don't".
N7JFG
If this falls between a 2080 and the 2080 TI in terms of gaming performance at 100$ less than the 2080, this is a definite buy.
Glottiz
https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2019/01/AMD-Radeon-VII-2560x1440-High-Quality-FF15.png
keep dreaming
residentour
Aura89
slicer
To be honest that FS score is few hundred higher than my Vega64 OC score and also my TimeSpy score is similar. Few hundred points less.
FS:
Graphics Score: 27 411
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/17909241
FS Ultra:
Graphics Score 6 616
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/18084680
TimeSpy:
Graphics Score 8 510
https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5853405
I am running now on custom water, but previuosly I had aircooled Morpheus II cooler and with that the scores were maybe 100-200 points lower.
So Vega 7 is not that impressive.
But those scores are like bare minimum ofcourse. Overclocking Vega 7 will result at least +3000-3500 points on those leaked numbers.
metagamer
Kinda underwhelmed by this, late to the party yet again AMD.
N7JFG
schmidtbag
Embra
Maybe see a couple Pro-sumer tests?
Aura89
metagamer
Fox2232
Srsbsns
Odd results IMO.
Here is my Vega 64 Liquid and 2700X both in a maxed out OC state. I literally cant OC them any further. Im 800 points from a Vega VII???
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/32925001?
schmidtbag
barbacot
I don't understand AMD price politics other than pure greed or stupidity??? So they release a product with nothing new in terms of technology - only more RAM - than the direct competitor at virtually the same price at same or lower performance???
Also AMD price politics on this new generation graphic cards could be a warning sign for their price politics on ryzen 2 which people wait like the second coming of Christ.