AMD Radeon RX rumor: 12nm Polaris 30 in the 4th quarter
Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon RX rumor: 12nm Polaris 30 in the 4th quarter on our message forum
warlord
It would be rather interesting if it will be at last more efficient perf/w and worthy perf/$ from its preview generation models.
I mean look at vega. It failed. Newer generation never meant to be more power hungry and more expensive AT THE SAME TIME than previous one. Vega would be a success if it would be more eco friendly than fury, this was never supposed to happen.
Let's see if AMD learned something from the last year's fiasco.
Embra
AMD needs volume for these GPUs. Lots of them and at good prices. Bread and butter GPUs.
Evildead666
sammarbella
Silva
I would only buy an used GPU for less than half the price (not what they are asking for), so I'd gladly buy the RX670 over any GPU on the used marked that was used for mining.
I wonder if they'll get GDDR6 too. Although more expensive, it uses less power and has more density I think so less chips or bigger memory. Or a smaller bus and same speed as GDDR5 equivalent because of higher clocks.
RzrTrek
They could begin with releasing a new driver, free from stutter in major DX11 games and fully functional OSD, but perhaps that's asking too much.
schmidtbag
I will only see this as good news if this is 15% improvement is specifically above the 580 (the mentioning of the 570 is a little off-putting), and, if this is sold as the 670 or lower. If this is going to be the 680, that's looking kind of bleak.
I don't get any stuttering. No comment on the OSD though - I never use it (but, maybe that's what your problem is?).
Too bad the open source Linux drivers don't support DX, because they're overall better than the Windows drivers. To my knowledge, they can be ported to Windows.
Celcius
Carping about the energy efficiency of any GCN-based video card in mid-2018 is very much like flogging the proverbial dead horse. GCN has never been about energy effiency, and likely never will be. We're seven years into this architecture; it's not likely to suddenly go Prius on us. I accepted this reality quite some time ago, and, obviously only speaking for myself, am quite comfortable with my (sometimes) 200W Radeon. The neighbor down the road is probably using more than ten times that much on his dinky mining setup, 24/7, and I'm supposed to agonize over my few hours of gaming per week? No...
I've been unpacking and installing the Windows 7 Adrenaline drivers for my Windows 8.1 rig without a single issue, and haven't been plagued with any performance problems. There is always room for improvement, of course, but I can't say I've much of anything to complain about, aside from RTG dropping Windows 8.1 support like a hot, radioactive potato. But, I've gotten over that, too.
Discussing the pricing of ANY video card while in the shadow of crypto-currency mining and VRAM pricing issues is, at best, nebulous. I'd like to see the launch-date MSRP return on every AMD and Nvidia card, for sure. Not holding my breath waiting for that to happen.
If AMD decides to take a third bite of the Polaris apple, I feel the only thing they need to accomplish is to give the buyer the level of performance that he or she requires, at a price they are comfortable paying. Done. The specifics of whatever contrivance is pushing the pixels around on my screen isn't something I obsess over while immersed in work, or while gaming.
RooiKreef
Since I have a Polaris card, I always wondered about the architecture if it had similar clock frequencies as Nvidia Pascal +- 2000Mhz and then AMD add some HBM2 memory into the equation. I would love too see that combo.
Fox2232
Price, that's only thing that matters. Polaris was not expensive to make (w/ 5.7B transistors). And pricing was good before mining. If this can be those 15% faster, then it will be mostly between Fury and Fury X in performance. Sometimes above, sometimes below this range.
That's very good performance. RX 580 is good GPU, but it misses that tiny bit of performance to max out game like Witcher 3 on 1080p and keep 60fps+ at most of the times.
So, I think this refresh (if real) will be just OK for AAA titles and people who do not want to spend fortune on gaming PC.
But I do question background... that untold story. If this comes out, it means AMD took officially step back from Vega. That would be final confirmation about Raja's "leaving".
Seikon
Well my Rx480 is chocked by memory bandwidth , using better timings gives me e better performance boost then going from 1303 to 1420 on the core , so if they manage to bring a 1600mhz polaris +gddr6 it should beat a gtx1070 if you ask me :/
AMDfan
Why would they shrink Polaris to 12 Nm when Vega 20 on 7Nm is in full production (as we speak), launch Q4 2018 Q1 2019....
I say there will be no Polaris 30 cards
BReal85
Fox2232
warlord
Polaris 30 aka rx 680 have a reason to exist only if it will be absolutely equal to gtx 1070 or always better than 980ti/furyX. It should be just the gpu below 1070ti/vega56. Anything else is for the trashcan.
Fox2232
warlord
AMD prices are not really that bad. In my country 580 rx averages about 150-200 euro less than gtx 1070. Only Vega has a really problematic pricing to my eyes. I really hope rx 680 can be kept under 400€. That's all. And this is the normal level of price for mid range.
fantaskarsef
The only thing that usually cripples AMD's sales is limited availability. There's people definately waiting for the next RX cards, but they have to be available in apropriate quantities and for a good price.
Fox2232
fantaskarsef