AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT: Specs, Price, and Release Date

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT: Specs, Price, and Release Date on our message forum
#6197200
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/108/108389.jpg
Officially, the RX 7600 XT with 16GB of memory is expected to deliver improved gaming performance at 1080p/1440p with maximum settings and ray tracing
LOL I couldn't laugh any harder, I can't breath...
#6197205
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180081.jpg
This is a disappointing product. They could've at least put in a bit more performance.
#6197214
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/218/218363.jpg
Weirdos. That's a very strange business decision indeed.
#6197216
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251189.jpg
Horus-Anhur:

Given the name, one would expect more shaders and a wider memory bus.
With which chip? Looks like they can completely ignore the A770.
#6197222
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/239/239063.jpg
extra VRAM cost $$$, you want a free upgrade? lmao
#6197223
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
It will be faster than 7600 becouse 8gb is a bottleneck in most games at 1440p. I wish it had more cores as well.
#6197225
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/248/248291.jpg
valentyn0:

extra VRAM cost $$$, you want a free upgrade? lmao
1Gb of GDDR6costs $3.364. So those extra 8GB of vram cost less than 27$. While AMD is charging 60$ more.
#6197227
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251189.jpg
You can't expect anything less if otherwise no one would buy the 8GB models anymore.
#6197230
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/273/273754.jpg
WTF, AMD. No CU bump, double vram compared to non XT, a clock boost and a tiny 128-bit bus. And a f'ing X8 bus.
#6197232
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/275/275921.jpg
When your only card left in the hand is Vram.
#6197236
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216349.jpg
AuerX:

When your only card left in the hand is Vram.
Well, the 7600 already maxes out the Navi 33 chip, so their only options was to increase clocks or increase Vram... They cornered themselves with their stupid naming scheme...
#6197241
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/275/275921.jpg
H83:

Well, the 7600 already maxes out the Navi 33 chip, so their only options was to increase clocks or increase Vram... They cornered themselves with their stupid naming scheme...
I think they cornered themselves with lack of innovation way back when, and the current market share supports that theory. This is bottom tier stuff, and will only sell if cheap enough or to those who think VRAM on this thing will give some kind of forum/peer feelgood.
#6197245
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270792.jpg
OMG. Bizarre.
#6197253
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251189.jpg
H83:

They cornered themselves with their stupid naming scheme...
Not so much their naming scheme is the issue, but RDNA3 being a disappointment in terms of technical progress.
#6197256
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/247/247218.jpg
AMDs 4060Ti. Basically, those graphs are the Nvidia mumbo-jumbo with upscaler and frame gen. At least is cheaper than even 4060Ti 8GB
#6197262
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/275/275921.jpg
NGGJimmy:

AMDs 4060Ti. Basically, those graphs are the Nvidia mumbo-jumbo with upscaler and frame gen. At least is cheaper than even 4060Ti 8GB
Pretty sure AMD dug their own hole here, if anything Nvidia handed them the shovel.
#6197266
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/55/55855.jpg
Pmsl!
#6197278
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
taking ques from nvidia charge more for less or equal to last gen for most of current gen
#6197281
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/218/218363.jpg
It's almost a bit sweet that they compare the card to a 2060 which is 5 years old 😀

Next Page