AMD Radeon R9 NANO review
Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon R9 NANO review on our message forum
CalculuS
Those are actually quite impressive numbers, the price however is slightly less impressive.
Tbh, this will give AMD a little foothold though in the gpu market, or atleast I hope so :boozer:
gUNN1993
Looks like a great card for a niche market, a really niche market, honestly at least it seems more pragmatic than a Titan X.
Ryu5uzaku
It's like really great card with a silly price, niche market sure. Great review.
Ven0m
The performance looks really great, especially at this size, but it's way too expensive.
eclap
I was thinking all along this is a great little card, impressive. Then I saw the price. This is on par if not more expensive than the 980ti over here in the UK. No way.
randomizer
Oh a great performer but like everyone else on here, I agree it's going to be expensive. Especially down under, us Aussies are going to pay more!!!
Turanis
Thanks Hilbert,Great review.
Now we have to wait DX12 games and the battle for truth between Maxwell 2 and Fiji/Hawaii chips.
On water colling system will be a mini monster.
eclap
moab600
This card is DOA, not cause of bad performance, cause it has good performance.
Price is too premium and means nothing, 980TI can be picked at that price or even Fury X.
This product is for very small crowd, bad mistake by AMD, they need a product that the mass will want and buy.
looniam
nice job hilbert, methinks this will be the only "fair" review i shall be linking in other forums . . just saying.
fantaskarsef
Great review Hilbert, thanks for putting it inside a case too! 🙂
Personally I'm positively surprised by it's performance on the bench, but not inside a case. And imho, the case HH used isn't even small enough to make really good use of the card's small features, and there already we see thermal throttling by 15%.
Then again, the price isn't really something to ignore...
Ryu5uzaku
morbias
I'm so glad the NDA is up because this has been bugging me - why wasn't the Fiji Pro GPU used on this card instead of the full blown XT?
The XT already has low yields and using it on this card takes away GPUs needed for Fury X production.
Given the low power and heat constraints surely it would have made more sense to use the Pro from the outset, especially as imposing these design limitations on the XT GPU results in Pro performance anyway.
This would have cut production costs and made the price more competitive, no?
And as Hilbert mentions in the review, a 4k gaming card which would be perfect for HTPCs but no HDMI 2.0 - seems a little odd.
---TK---
Denial
cleverman
The price is high due to the memory being used.
Anything this new has a premium price we all know this stop saying its expensive, I bet there making no profit what so ever on these.
cowie
Undying
I still think they shoud've made Nano weaker, cut down from XT and place it in 350-400$ price range. I know that segment is crowded but still it would make such a card so much more appealing.
Denial
cowie